ZeroClub.... I think once we realize we can't run like last year, we will use the short passing game as an extension of the run game, and I think Dunbar will excel there.
But as far as churning for a viable solution, I don't see a viable solution out there. Draft was our best chance.
I think you are right - the draft was the best chance.
I have a difficult time appreciating Dunbar's supposed role in this offense. Although he may be nifty in space and a potential threat catching the ball, he's not so great at pass protection. And if he isn't particularly good in pass protection, is he really the best back to have in the backfield during passing situations?
If Dunbar isn't the guy to pick up the blitz, why not go with an empty backfield and put an extra receiver on the field? If I have a choice between Escobar and Dunbar, I'd rather the ball go to Escobar.
To his credit, Dunbar does a decent job on special teams, which is important, but as a running back he's limited in what he gives you. When Dunbar is in the backfield, everyone looks for a screen or a pass out of the backfield. Dunbar is kind of like Tyson Thompson (everyone knew that if Thompson was in the backfield, he was going to get the ball). Dunbar offers no deception.
A couple of seasons ago Garrett went on and on about how, despite being undersized, Dunbar was a physical back who could run between the tackles without getting beat up. It wasn't until Dunbar kept on getting hurt that Garrett finally stopped telling us how physically tough Dunbar was.
Obviously, I'm not a big fan.
