Search results

Hey, at least I don't want him dead. But it's a near thing.

But it's true I make no bones about wanting him gone. I think he was and is a long term cancer on this team, even a jinx. Nine years is long enough. Go play somewhere else. You're 34 and stove up now, retire gracefully.

Romo goes down in history as a sometimes quite fun but failed experiment, unless by some miracle the stars align and he happens to be on the roster when Dallas wins something significant. That's just how it is. He is the franchise.

Nine years of failure and mediocrity, that he is the face of. Jerry's man love for him, leading him to continue to prop up the offense for him, tailor it to him, and virtually ignoring defensive needs. It needs to be over. It was a fun experiment but only just. I'd really like to see where I've...

Where's this? Where's this? I think you have my posts confused with others. I don't rant about Redball or Jerry, and never said we can't win with Romo. I just want the Romo era over with, quickly like the first week of camp, so we can move on already. It's been nine years of mediocrity and...

As soon as you show me where anyone ever claimed Romo's picks were the reasons for the losses in 2013, your stat isn't a straw man. You're arguing something no one's disputed or even said. Give us THAT injury off the books even, and you're probably in the playoffs. See how this works? My list...

Except it was, in every loss. Terrible 3rd down performance marks it all. The offense continuing to give the opponent the ball back. Give us a couple of those back, and a couple of scores off all the turnovers, and you're in the playoffs.

Straw man of the day, since no one claimed otherwise or tried to say he threw as many games away last year as in the past. BUT: All the losses do have in common, terrible third down efficiency - including the 0/9 against Nawlins, 3/13 against Detroit, and so on. But I am sure you don't hold...

What difference does their skin pigmentation make?

Overall point still stands. Randle is in why? Injuries. Dallas' offense only ranks 16th in the league? injuries. Would it shock you to find out Dallas ranked 29th most healthy team in 2013, and the defensive line was more than 70% of it? There's a annual study that correlates games lost due to...

:funny

The argument is, this team is NOT all as bad as people like to believe.

Let's get some fucking points off some of the turnovers it provided. Let's give them some help with a couple less games where we are 3/13 on fucking third down. Let's not have some of the key injuries it had. You're laying it all on the defense in a game where it provided FIVE turnovers no...

Look at the list, Man. It is a list of why we are 8-8 instead of 11-5. It doesn't mention specific players like fumble machine Dunbar, or drop prone Austin. It doesn't mention Orton's last career throw. It's not a knock on anyone. It's just pointing out this team - in today's NFL - isn't all...

:rolfanim:tiphat We've come so far from when it was 13 rounds and few paid attention to it, you'd think they would get the clue and find ways to make it shorter still, not longer.

I never brought up Romo at all. The reflexive defense of him when not even mentioned is sort of fun to watch. It's almost like a man crush thing. Hell I'll even throw in to my list: One or two less key injuries. So the list goes: A interception or two less at crucial times A fumble or two less...

A interception or two less at crucial times A fumble or two less at crucial times Maybe some points off all the turnovers this horrible defense gave the offense Maybe a couple less games where third down success was abysmal, 3 for 13 and crap And this team is 11-5.

Good thing that wasn't the only meter. Romobama - can't say anything negative about him even if true - especially if true! Or even if it's not him specifically you're talking about! That's what's so funny about what I said, never mentioned Romo at all.

If we would have gone 11-5 last year with the historically bad defense, Garrett's a genius suddenly, right?