Search results

And it's retroactive too. Militant gays are backreading social media to see if any NFL player EVER posted a slur or anything that could remotely be considered a slur.

Maybe you should consult the RoH charter. There's nothing in it which resembles this.

Hey, watch the Gay slurs.:razz

And instead, concentrating on making the offense more "Romo Friendly." And my answer to that was, "Offensive line wasn't anything close to the problem injury wise the defensive line was. Offensive line has been pretty good actually. But yeah, with three first round picks in it, it really SHOULD...

That's why it's been working hard to make the offense more "Romo Friendly" for the last five years or so. Their words, not mine.

You believe it should be only just for big stars who scored alot of touchdowns. Yes, because it is employed so often by so many weak minded morons. Calling them on it isn't the problem, that the morons continue to employ it, is.

They were addressing different ideas, not the same one as is your claim. Anyone can check it and see you're just a dishonest broker. That's actually about the third time I've said that. Know what special teams headhunters are? Invented to stop Bates. And weren't very effective against him but...

That's subjective. When in actuality, they grade out pretty decent. The O-line is far from your worst problem. If they can be only half as banged up as last year that alone would be a big help.

Maybe he's considered more "Romo Friendly."

You're basing this on how many sacks the quarterbacks took, or the less than stellar running game? Hopefully we'll find that out.

Then you're just stupid. When people stop employing the straw fallacy, I'll stop pointing it out. You don't understand it, and feel left out. It's okay, you have access to all the world's information at your fingertips. All you need do is choose to use it.

You know that's incorrect. That's your straw account. My actual argument has been stated many times and you have had zero answer for it, so you have to pretend, and address a argument I never made.. Pointing out Bates is considered by the organization a top ten safety was and only ever is, the...

Offensive line wasn't anything close to the problem injury wise the defensive line was. Offensive line has been pretty good actually. But yeah, with three first round picks in it, it really SHOULD be good.

Or even if we DO watch out! :eek

I did not. The Dallas Cowboys did.

Yes the NFL network has several Dallas games airing today starting at 2pm central time.

October 12 at Seattle Seahawks - For the second time, we return to the scene of the slick ball crime for a chance at redemption, however hollow and small it might be. I thought the visit to Seattle in week 2 of the 2012 season would fire them up, but they left there with a 27-7 drubbing sticking...

I can see them easily being 2-4 by the time the first divisional game with the Giants rolls around. Wonder if so, does Jerry pull the plug on Redball? 1 September 7 San Francisco 49ers - L 2 September 14 at Tennessee Titans - L 3 September 21 at St. Louis Rams - W 4 September 28 New...

I'll add Jim Jeffcoat and Darren Woodson to Bates and the Moose, for the next inductions to the Ring.

As I have said, Bates qualifies for his fifteen years of ass kicking service, his honor and courage, and his outstanding contributions to the Dallas Cowboys. As soon as you name another player from any other team the NFL created a new position for in the Pro Bowl, feel free to do so. I can...