dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 62,116
- Reaction score
- 12,045
um, no...?
If that's what you got out of this thread, there's something wrong.
What we're doing is shifting some of the non-guaranteed portions of these players contracts into guaranteed money and spreading out the cap hit over a longer period of time. We are increasing these players cap hits for 2014, 2015 and so on while trying to decrease the 2013 cap hit. So instead of cutting these players when they've outlived their usefulness in 2014 and moving on, we're faced with the decision of cutting the player when they're done and spending part of our cap towards their still-guaranteed money (dead money) or retaining a declining player on the roster.
Again, if the team believes said player will be here, then it isnt a big deal.
The problem would be to have too many guys who they gave the guaranteed money NEEDING to be cut at the same time, which is highly unlikely to happen.
So far, I think the only debatable new deal/restructuring they gave is the Ratliff one. He's struggled to stay healthy for a couple of years and had a really stupid off field incident this year, combined with an advanced age. And if somehow he stays healthy, he could make this one not look so bad because he does appear to be a great fit for this defensive scheme.