2026 Election Thread
- Thread starter dbair1967
- Start date
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 71,471
- Reaction score
- 19,440
100%
And whole heartedly deserved.
I think Musk and Trump are going to combine and bankroll someone in SD to no end to get this man out of office.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 13,010
- Reaction score
- 7,985
That reporter shouldn't have left, he should have quickly said "Not true, see how easy that is?....Now back to you, how do you respond to her allegations?"
Creeper
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 3,694
The idea of packing the Supreme Court with 13 or more judges is the really scary part and I think most Americans do not understand what this would mean. Just the thought of packing the court because the current justices do not rule the way they want them too is bad enough, but what packing the court actually means is the loss of representative government.
Democrats want to put ideologues on the court. The law won't matter anymore. The court will rule on cases based only on politics. Think of 13 Katenji Brown Jacksons ruling on all cases. Who we elect to congress won't matter because law will be made by the court. Democrats will take every policy issues to the Supreme Court to get the favorable rulings they want. I will be the end of America as we know it. This is no exaggeration.
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 8,144
- Reaction score
- 7,744
WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.”
WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.” * The Gateway Pundit * by Wayne Allyn Root
By Wayne Allyn Root I have very bad news, but then I have really great news.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 8,144
- Reaction score
- 7,744
Creeper
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 3,694
I have no idea what the hell this guy is talking about. This article is like a rant that never explains what the rant is about. I see nothing on the SCOTUS blog that involves election laws or cases. What am I missing?WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.”
WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.” * The Gateway Pundit * by Wayne Allyn Root
By Wayne Allyn Root I have very bad news, but then I have really great news.
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 71,471
- Reaction score
- 19,440
they allowed the bullshit mail in ballot forever scheme to continue
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 71,471
- Reaction score
- 19,440
Some would say we are already there.
Creeper
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 3,694
I missed that. Of course it is John Roberts and ACB again. The twisted logic they used to allow this practice to continue is just more liberal absurdity. According to Barrett, the constitution says nothing about mail-in ballots being counted after election day so the SC cannot add words to the constitution. It is that kind of thinking that just screams TDS. The constitution stipulates an ELECTION DAY., and it specifies the day elections are to take place. If anything, the constitution states that there should be no early voting or late mail in ballots. The SC seems to think "election day is actually a deadline rather than an action election day.
The one thing on the plus side is ballots have to be postmarked no later than elections day. That means states can throw away ballots marked after election day or ballots with no post marks at all.
But the answer is to limit mail-in ballots for now, only to those people who cannot physically get to a polling place. With early voting there is no reason anyone needs an absentee ballot, except military personnel stationed overseas.
Creeper
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 3,694
This is not new news. But yes, it is true. The problem is she has attracted a fairly large contingent of morons like herself that are avid fans. The larger problem this Democratic Socialism is gaining more supporters every year.
It should be embarrassing to the DNC that someone as stupid as AOC is out their with a loud voice representing the Democratic Party. But today, all that matters is winning, even if it is stupid that is doing the winning.
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 8,144
- Reaction score
- 7,744
Maybe watching him explain on a video will help:
Creeper
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 3,013
- Reaction score
- 3,694
Yes, someone already pointed out the SC ruled that allowing ballots to be counted after election day is constitutional.
I disagree but what do I know. The reality is that the constitution authorizes states to determine the time and manner of elections. But feral law makes the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November election day.
2 US Code 7
"The Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is established as the day for the election, in each of the States and Territories of the United States, of Representatives and Delegates to the Congress commencing on the 3d day of January next thereafter."
This law, to me, sets a specific date for elections for federal offices. While the constitution does give states the authority to determine the time and manner of elections, it also gives congress the power to set parameters about the time and manner.
Article 2 Section 4
"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators." (their spelling, not mine).
To me this means the federal law specifying election day supersedes the constitution by authority of the constitution. Unless you use Clintonian logic to define "election" meaning a monthlong process instead of what the law says about it being a day, all these laws for early voting, late mail-in ballots etc, are illegal.
And if you go back to those times when these laws were written it was about people showing up to a place to vote. Even the choice of day of the week was to give people a chance to get to the place to cast their vote which was often many miles from their homes. I am certain that when election day was established in 1845 we had a functional postal system. But voting was still an in person endeavor.
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 28,017
- Reaction score
- 12,145
Something we need more of.