100%Imagine being so out of touch and ignorant that you make that statement on Pressler's video and don't think there will be backlash. But he said that Thune himself directed the staff to not let Pressler in. Thune is dead man (politically) walking.
Loser Masshole throwing a hissy fit.
I have no idea what the hell this guy is talking about. This article is like a rant that never explains what the rant is about. I see nothing on the SCOTUS blog that involves election laws or cases. What am I missing?WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.”
![]()
WAYNE ROOT: The Supreme Court Just Legalized Stolen Elections. No Choice Now President Trump. This is a Life or Death Emergency. You Must Sign “National Security Emergency for Elections.” * The Gateway Pundit * by Wayne Allyn Root
By Wayne Allyn Root I have very bad news, but then I have really great news.www.thegatewaypundit.com
they allowed the bullshit mail in ballot forever scheme to continueI have no idea what the hell this guy is talking about. This article is like a rant that never explains what the rant is about. I see nothing on the SCOTUS blog that involves election laws or cases. What am I missing?
Some would say we are already there.The idea of packing the Supreme Court with 13 or more judges is the really scary part and I think most Americans do not understand what this would mean. Just the thought of packing the court because the current justices do not rule the way they want them too is bad enough, but what packing the court actually means is the loss of representative government.
Democrats want to put ideologues on the court. The law won't matter anymore. The court will rule on cases based only on politics. Think of 13 Katenji Brown Jacksons ruling on all cases. Who we elect to congress won't matter because law will be made by the court. Democrats will take every policy issues to the Supreme Court to get the favorable rulings they want. I will be the end of America as we know it. This is no exaggeration.
I missed that. Of course it is John Roberts and ACB again. The twisted logic they used to allow this practice to continue is just more liberal absurdity. According to Barrett, the constitution says nothing about mail-in ballots being counted after election day so the SC cannot add words to the constitution. It is that kind of thinking that just screams TDS. The constitution stipulates an ELECTION DAY., and it specifies the day elections are to take place. If anything, the constitution states that there should be no early voting or late mail in ballots. The SC seems to think "election day is actually a deadline rather than an action election day.they allowed the bullshit mail in ballot forever scheme to continue
Maybe watching him explain on a video will help:I have no idea what the hell this guy is talking about. This article is like a rant that never explains what the rant is about. I see nothing on the SCOTUS blog that involves election laws or cases. What am I missing?