Search results

Orrrrr, maybe not in most cases. Maybe if he gave two shits about protecting the ball we wouldn't need 35-plus points.

Nobody hates Romo. Some of us though understand that no matter what, by hook or by crook, his fault the refs fault Jerry's fault Garrett's fault, or the fault of the flawed system, or fault of other players, the wind, the weather, whatever - Tony Romo spent ten years as the Dallas quarterback...

From Seattle to Seattle, the true Romo legacy. From the moment he fumbled that snap all those years ago for the playoff game-winning field goal in Seattle, to the moment a Seattle player broke his back again in a preseason game this year, Tony Romo has been Dallas' lovable loser. Emphasis on...

Only in your mind. There's no question at all Romo's been a Yuk yuk guy. Never really took any of this nearly as seriously as Dak does. The 'what me worry kid' of football, always managing to fucking lose the big game somehow but also somehow through no fault of his own. Never had any respect...

That's right, and you can't dispute one word of it.

Right. Never mind the idiocy of exposing him to injury in a meaningless game. Never mind that when that injury happens we probably lose his services for future playoff games that do matter... Never mind that he might wind up paralyzed. No. You just want your lovable loser to play again. There's...

Considering the source and laughing my ass off.

Not having him for the playoffs. That's what. That's why it is toweringly stupid and irresponsible to have him out there in any capacity whatsoever, against Philadelphia - a game that matters not at all unless we MAKE it matter by doing something this stupid.

Annnnnd the fucking little Romosexuals out here get to see the happy go lucky chuckling butt slapping grinning Romo, the "what me worry kid" of football, the "that's okay we'll get 'em next time" wayfarer, their abject failure of a hero, play once again.

It's okay with me for you to invent a false narrative to support another false narrative. At the core of it, is your false narrative that I not only hate Romo, but that I also have no rational reason for hating Romo. Both are false - I don't hate him but I do have very good and rational reasons...

Yes, but I believe the exact figure was 50.

Orrrr.... "TO BOOST TONY'S TRAAAAAADE VALUE!!!" Which will be exactly zero when he gets broken again. It's a stupid gamble, on so many levels. And that's IF it's even a gamble - gambling at least has a purpose, a goal in mind.

That and the patriots or whoever the opponent is, will run run run the ball with impunity, all day.

Take #3 and 4 and add, "Now Dak has the added burden of Tony breathing down his neck, any mistake he makes now gets amplified."

So, we gamble his future health and mobility for the remote chance it bolsters his trade value? It's really worth the risk of him breaking his back again or getting that shattered collarbone re-shattered? It actually only reminds me of how you're still sucking his dick.

I don't care about any tiebreakers. I'm not out to "win" anything.

You don't see the upside because the upside does not exist.

A really stupid and irresponsible thing to do. On many levels. There is NO upside to it. Romo getting reps, two weeks before any other game action is possible? It doesn't help with rust or anything else. Please tell me they're really not this stupid.

Interesting how the article never mentions our 2007 number one seed, HVA 13-3 team that was one and done. It's happened before.

They stopped running the ball. Like at least 8 other teams we played. And they never went back to it even though with 2 and 3 man fronts, we were practically daring them. Main reason? Besides running isn't considered sexay? Our pourous pass defense proves too tempting. When our run defense...