Search results

They think he is soooooooo great but also think he needs resume building for trade value. They don't realize yet that any interested parties are gonna insist on him passing their physical exam.

If you think one series in a meaningless game moves the meter for trade value, then you're a fool. What WOULD move that meter is if he came in off the bench and won us a playoff game. Which he wouldn't be able to do if we kept playing him here and he got hurt.

Yep. Really sharp when it really doesn't matter.

Didn't see any rust there at all. Williams needed to wake up and stop jogging through that first route.

Pregame reports were that if the protection wasn't good we won't see Romo.

Pass protection leaving a little to be desired there on our first drive.

It actually reeks of a farewell to Romo, because this is his last year in Dallas and stuff.

A tad fewer bonehead picks in critical situations and a few less fumbles in crucial situations and he has a ring or two here. It's half dozen of one, six of the other. You all like to pretend there hasn't been multiple chances for Tony to strike gold. He never respected the ball. Protecting it...

There's no contradiction, as I explained in the other thread where you posted this. Even injury prone and immobile as Romo is, he's still a better choice for playoff backup duty, than butt-fumble Sanchez. Butt-fumble is who you play today vs. Philadelphia, NOT Romo. You're fucking stupid to play...

Maybe you're too stupid or obtuse to see the actual argument, which you have mis-stated. The argument is, Romo should not see the field today vs. Philadelphia in a MEANINGLESS GAME because of injury risk. No matter how stove up, washed up and loserly Romo is, when healthy he is still a better...

It kills me that they're even considering it. Not the least of which reason, we might NEED him in a playoff game or SB and if he gets broken by the Iggles, we trot out Sanchez instead if Tony's hurt. To me nothing justifies that risk.

Ain't that what I said in the first post, bigger dipshit? There's tons of excuses, but never Tony himself.

Yep it was alllllways something. Just never Tony himself. The refs fault Jerry's fault Garrett's fault, or the fault of the flawed system, or fault of other players, the wind, the weather, whatever. Tony was perfect and just never really had a chance to succeed. Just ain't fair. The lovable loser.

Same team without Dak was 4-12 last year. Same team with Dak - 13-2 with one to go.

He's outright saying Dak couldn't be any good outside of dallas because of the "great" team we have. But can't wrap his head around what if he could and in fact could inspire other mediocre teams to play well above their ability.

Might could, never know. Was the point. That's your own cross to bear.

That's something we really don't know and can't see. Possibly he inspires greatness in others more than he himself has, and they play above their abilities. People are saying that, about the Dallas defense this year. I've little doubt it wouldn't have happened just about anywhere else, save...

Yep just saw the condensed "Game of the Week" replay of this game, and right before the fake punt one of the eagles assistants was telling the players how tired Dallas was, how they didn't want it, all that. Then BOOM, what he was telling them, happened to them.

Pretty sure I'm about the only one posting here who's already said we're one and done this year. I have no illusions of Lombardis. I don't trust this organization, this HC, or this defense. Yeah cos Dallas screwed him so royally, paying him 100 million bucks to play a game for ten years. And you...

Says the disposable douche.