Search results

The whole part about Montana is a big SO WHAT. A, nobody really knew what Montana would become and B, in 1978 Dallas had a Super Bowl winning QB in his prime, and a proven solid QB in White. That and pissing away the chance to get either Marino or Elway, when clearly there was interest to get...

Great post BC. Is this your own original work?

Maybe Stephen will? There's that possibility I guess. But I really doubt it strongly.

That alone signifies the problem the defense had with its off the street, patchwork line and linebacker corps.

The one actual point they make in this piece is the one we don't need 1000 words to make - All those wishing Jerry would please hurry up and fucking die better realize that means we'd then have 40 years or so of his Idiot Son totally in charge.

I agree with this totally. It was a turning point, historic moment nobody except maybe Parcells himself, realized at the time.

Actually in my experience, most teams whose coaches get fired mid season continue to bomb. And if anyone on the roster had "given up" and wasn't trying as hard as possible to win, then suddenly started playing really well, that guy or guys might need to find a new team and this if true might be...

EDIT - you're right again. Is that Garrett's ONLY winning record? Nobody was. I merely pointed out that the one time we were without Romo for any extended period of time, we were able to do at least as well as .500 ball without the God of Quarterbacks. I stand corrected! That was Manning's...

Of course I understand it wasn't your meter. And I also understand the perception that it's us more than them.

We just got done debunking that "can't win without Romo" myth in post #7. I'd really like to try it without him for a full season.

I just have Romo fatigue and will be very happy when he is in Cleveland, backing up Manziel. Like it or not he is the face of the franchise. The face of failure and mediocrity. The face of 8-8, 8-8, 8-8. The face of the fumbled extra point snap in Seattle. The face of many other game losing...

As I pointed out, I wasn't. I merely also pointed out that if just one of those turnovers were converted into points, Dallas wins the Detroit game. He WAS talking about the Detroit game however. We've agreed to lay the blame on the defense, for the Denver loss. Isn't that about how it is, in...

Honestly I'd like to see us try a entire season without the Romo crutch. Hoping he'll snap his achy breaky back in early camp.

2010: Team was already 1-5 when Romo broke his collarbone.... Was 5-5 after, with him on IR.. The 5-5 includes the road win over previously undefeated Colts.

Duh.

No kidding. But then he's made a living out of being Captain Obvious. Or Captain Oblivious, whichever you prefer. ^^ This is pure hyperbole, you can't possibly know that. Without Romo they might have to like, have a controlled passing game and like, run the ball alot more behind that three...

He was talking about the Detroit game. The one where the defense garnered five turnovers. Which does not fit his meter of "have to score last every week in order to win." Some of those on your list are the ones who had to score last.

But.... What is the new system?

Like this one.

That's a icon you chose for the post.