Search results

I seriously doubt it.

Murray did more than he ever has or has ever been asked to do. Many many more touches.

My agenda is, dudes who actually do MORE have a better case for MVP than dudes who do less. That's all. Doesn't matter the dudes involved.

Especially not ones you might be facing in the playoffs.

This. He has the best case for winning this than any of the other candidates.

Hey Man, he is the head coach. He took his team from the 8-8 doldrums to the heights of 12-4. Won four more games than last year, by doing less. All the other candidates for this, did more. Therefore Garrett should win.

Even worse than that, getting to the NFC title game and losing. Especially three years in a row.

That just seems like a qual for a award, is all.

Me too. What with his reduced role and all.

Four more wins than last year. With only a few breaks here and there, last year's team could have done that too. And the year before. And the year before.

Hell, might could wind up a Cowboy next year!

Right and NONE of those had the head coach neutered.

But..... He's had to do less. Less is moar!

LOL +1

But.... But.... We are 12-4 and he's done lesssss. That seems to be the qual.

Same amount of games in both seasons? Orrrrrr.... Maybe it makes sense to let your star RB who's always averaged at least 4 yards a pop, to vastly increase his touches? That qualifies! The RB, that is. Murry actually has a better case for league MVP.

Thought there would be howls for this. We're 12-4 coming off three 8-8 seasons!

The wounded, cornered animal is the most dangerous one.

Nothing can do that.

If we can continue to limit its exposure with a good offensive conversion percentage on 3rd down, we can go far.