Search results

Right. Never mind the idiocy of exposing him to injury in a meaningless game. Never mind that when that injury happens we probably lose his services for future playoff games that do matter... Never mind that he might wind up paralyzed. No. You just want your lovable loser to play again. There's...

Considering the source and laughing my ass off.

Not having him for the playoffs. That's what. That's why it is toweringly stupid and irresponsible to have him out there in any capacity whatsoever, against Philadelphia - a game that matters not at all unless we MAKE it matter by doing something this stupid.

Annnnnd the fucking little Romosexuals out here get to see the happy go lucky chuckling butt slapping grinning Romo, the "what me worry kid" of football, the "that's okay we'll get 'em next time" wayfarer, their abject failure of a hero, play once again.

It's okay with me for you to invent a false narrative to support another false narrative. At the core of it, is your false narrative that I not only hate Romo, but that I also have no rational reason for hating Romo. Both are false - I don't hate him but I do have very good and rational reasons...

Yes, but I believe the exact figure was 50.

Orrrr.... "TO BOOST TONY'S TRAAAAAADE VALUE!!!" Which will be exactly zero when he gets broken again. It's a stupid gamble, on so many levels. And that's IF it's even a gamble - gambling at least has a purpose, a goal in mind.

That and the patriots or whoever the opponent is, will run run run the ball with impunity, all day.

Take #3 and 4 and add, "Now Dak has the added burden of Tony breathing down his neck, any mistake he makes now gets amplified."

So, we gamble his future health and mobility for the remote chance it bolsters his trade value? It's really worth the risk of him breaking his back again or getting that shattered collarbone re-shattered? It actually only reminds me of how you're still sucking his dick.

I don't care about any tiebreakers. I'm not out to "win" anything.

You don't see the upside because the upside does not exist.

A really stupid and irresponsible thing to do. On many levels. There is NO upside to it. Romo getting reps, two weeks before any other game action is possible? It doesn't help with rust or anything else. Please tell me they're really not this stupid.

Interesting how the article never mentions our 2007 number one seed, HVA 13-3 team that was one and done. It's happened before.

They stopped running the ball. Like at least 8 other teams we played. And they never went back to it even though with 2 and 3 man fronts, we were practically daring them. Main reason? Besides running isn't considered sexay? Our pourous pass defense proves too tempting. When our run defense...

Pretend Detroit was the first opponent gashing us with the run, who then abandoned what was working. I always allow a man his illusions. The bottom line is NO TEAM HAS KEPT AT IT and the first one that does, beats this defense down no problem. There's been no "different angle." This is what I...

We go into that rotating 2 or 3 man front after we're sure the opponent has abandoned the run, which all do and this is why our run defense stats look so "good." The Detroit game is a good example - the Lions abandoned the run that was gashing us, while they still had the lead! The first team...

If that really were the "sole means" then there wouldn't exist, smilies. Go back to your bong.

Yep one should at the very least, RIDE a rented mule some, before discarding it.