Search results

Pass protection leaving a little to be desired there on our first drive.

It actually reeks of a farewell to Romo, because this is his last year in Dallas and stuff.

A tad fewer bonehead picks in critical situations and a few less fumbles in crucial situations and he has a ring or two here. It's half dozen of one, six of the other. You all like to pretend there hasn't been multiple chances for Tony to strike gold. He never respected the ball. Protecting it...

There's no contradiction, as I explained in the other thread where you posted this. Even injury prone and immobile as Romo is, he's still a better choice for playoff backup duty, than butt-fumble Sanchez. Butt-fumble is who you play today vs. Philadelphia, NOT Romo. You're fucking stupid to play...

Maybe you're too stupid or obtuse to see the actual argument, which you have mis-stated. The argument is, Romo should not see the field today vs. Philadelphia in a MEANINGLESS GAME because of injury risk. No matter how stove up, washed up and loserly Romo is, when healthy he is still a better...

It kills me that they're even considering it. Not the least of which reason, we might NEED him in a playoff game or SB and if he gets broken by the Iggles, we trot out Sanchez instead if Tony's hurt. To me nothing justifies that risk.

Ain't that what I said in the first post, bigger dipshit? There's tons of excuses, but never Tony himself.

Yep it was alllllways something. Just never Tony himself. The refs fault Jerry's fault Garrett's fault, or the fault of the flawed system, or fault of other players, the wind, the weather, whatever. Tony was perfect and just never really had a chance to succeed. Just ain't fair. The lovable loser.

Same team without Dak was 4-12 last year. Same team with Dak - 13-2 with one to go.

He's outright saying Dak couldn't be any good outside of dallas because of the "great" team we have. But can't wrap his head around what if he could and in fact could inspire other mediocre teams to play well above their ability.

Might could, never know. Was the point. That's your own cross to bear.

That's something we really don't know and can't see. Possibly he inspires greatness in others more than he himself has, and they play above their abilities. People are saying that, about the Dallas defense this year. I've little doubt it wouldn't have happened just about anywhere else, save...

Yep just saw the condensed "Game of the Week" replay of this game, and right before the fake punt one of the eagles assistants was telling the players how tired Dallas was, how they didn't want it, all that. Then BOOM, what he was telling them, happened to them.

Pretty sure I'm about the only one posting here who's already said we're one and done this year. I have no illusions of Lombardis. I don't trust this organization, this HC, or this defense. Yeah cos Dallas screwed him so royally, paying him 100 million bucks to play a game for ten years. And you...

Says the disposable douche.

Orrrrr, maybe not in most cases. Maybe if he gave two shits about protecting the ball we wouldn't need 35-plus points.

Nobody hates Romo. Some of us though understand that no matter what, by hook or by crook, his fault the refs fault Jerry's fault Garrett's fault, or the fault of the flawed system, or fault of other players, the wind, the weather, whatever - Tony Romo spent ten years as the Dallas quarterback...

From Seattle to Seattle, the true Romo legacy. From the moment he fumbled that snap all those years ago for the playoff game-winning field goal in Seattle, to the moment a Seattle player broke his back again in a preseason game this year, Tony Romo has been Dallas' lovable loser. Emphasis on...

Only in your mind. There's no question at all Romo's been a Yuk yuk guy. Never really took any of this nearly as seriously as Dak does. The 'what me worry kid' of football, always managing to fucking lose the big game somehow but also somehow through no fault of his own. Never had any respect...

That's right, and you can't dispute one word of it.