Search results

McNabb a media darling. lol lol lol

I compared his numbers with the most recent QB's to get in the Hall.. Kelly, Aikman, Moon.. he matches up, if not surpasses them. Im not going to list all the accomplishments again, but they are there for those who choose not to ignore them.

To be blunt, when considering QB's for the Hall, i do not buy that they consider what system the guy played in. They look at numbers and accomplishments. He has both. PSSS- Don't care what you're opinions of him are. They don't matter to the Hall committee either.

..and actually, there's already been national talk of considering him for the Hall. Its not like im just pulling this out of my arse. Google McNabb - Hall of Fame and you'll see its a topic that's been discussed quite a bit. He has the credentials and the numbers to be close enough for...

There will always be excuses, but when its all said and done, imo, McNabb will be considered in Hall talk for all his accomplishments i listed above. Also, i've compared his stats with alot of Hall QB's and they are pretty damn similar if not better. Jim Kelly, Dan Fouts, Aikman, Warren Moon, etc..

Compare McNabb's stats to those of Fouts.. then get back to me. Consider also that Fouts had 2 Hall of Fame WR's to throw to for a majority of his career as well, while McNabb had Owens for 20 games and then toiled with the James Thrash's and Todd Pinkston's of the world for the majority of his.

Someone show me some evidence that he's on the decline and i'll gladly take it into consideration. "Did you see him play last year bra?!!" ..is not evidence of that btw.

A big part of it is stats.. but if you want to go on merit, he took the Eagles to 8 postseason appearances in a span of 10 years, 4 straight division championships, 5 NFC championship games, and one super bowl. He's also a 6 time pro bowler and a NFC offensive player of the year. He also is the...

Yup. By the end of their careers i'll put up 100 dollars against anyone that Maclin has the better numbers.

How many times did Westbrook lead the team in receiving? 36,000 passing yards, 230 Passing TD's and a 2 to 1 INT ratio are pretty damn good for a "weak passer". Not to mention he's had jack squat to work with in his career besides 20 games with TO. There's a good reason why Westbrook was one...

He was never a strong passer? Explain this ridiculous statement a little please? I think he can still be a very effective starter with weapons around him. As i said, i guess we will see if he gets traded to a better team. If not, he's stuck in NFL Hell there in DC.

I wouldn't put any stock into any decision Shannahan made last year. He and his son fielded a three ring circus instead of a football team. One bad year with a joke of an organization like that doesn't mean you're on decline, imo. You people look at the moves that have been made instead of his...

lol Hey now.. don't make it too easy for him.

Nah.. Kolb actually didn't when he took over in 2010. That's why Vick remained the starter.

I think that's one of the problems actually, that it ISN'T their own stadium. I want to see what the attendance figures are like next season when they do get their own place. Kinda curious.

No doubt. That was kinda my point though.. up until he left this season, he was the best pitcher we had since he came over in the trade.

I love how he talks like he's somebody.. "oh i tried to give them every oppertunity to sign me, blah blah blah.." Newsflash Cheech.. we didn't sign you back because you f u c k ing suck. Good riddance.

Clearly haven't watched him at all since he's been traded.

Im pretty sure the players got around 53 percent last year.

Weak. lol I would trust Mort though, he's usually pretty clued in to what's going on most times.