Search results

The owners sound like they are much closer to folding than the players.

Really? You can't understand why?

Thanks bud.. will do ;).

Alot of things can be proven with stats.. that's why they are always kept and detailed. Figured most people would understand that already, big guy. ;)

If you were more concerned with the dicussion, you'd know i already stated all that earlier in the thread big guy.

Oh, watched all the Eagles games did you? Then you saw how Vick started looking Maclin's way alot more as the season went along and Desean was wildly inconsistent. Maclin was more consistent, more productive, and is a better all around WR. Now please.. tell me about the WR that Welker...

If you factor in catches, yards, TD's.. which are the three most important stats for a WR.. who's leading the Eagles? I'll give you a hint, its the guy i've been talking about the entire thread. You can do it genius ;).

He had a low INT rate because he was smart not to throw into tight coverage when you had crap receivers like he did. You're supposed to do what he did and look for your checkdowns if you don't have someone open, and that's what he did, and he made his team very successful doing so. 8 out of 10...

That's cool. Maclin was their leading receiver in terms of production though so im not sure what Jackson's leading out there. The cry baby brigade maybe? Leader in texts to their agent during team meetings? Leader in pouting over being asked to run routes in the middle of the field?

Ah.. so its an opinion, yet you keep trying to pass it off as fact. lol This isn't homer, idiotic nonsense. This is about production being the thing that matters most in the NFL and the man who outproduced Jackson last year. You can keep telling me who you think is the best until you're blue...

It certainly doesn't. Jackson wasn't the best in the division in 2010, and Maclin will have the better career. Two completely seperate statements. You have nothing to qualify your statements that Jackson was the best in the division in 2010 other than "he was the best goddang it."...

Who will have the BETTER career.. ..and you're original statement isn't even correct.

Listen, if some of you think he has no shot, that's fine. You're welcome to your opinions obviously. Mine is that he has both the stats and accomplishments and he will be given alot of consideration for the Hall when his career is all said and done. He's at the very least right on the cusp of...

Pretty sure you're right for once. Nice job.

Jim Kelly lost 4 straight Super Bowls.. he's in. Saying he has no real accomplishments clearly shows a bias.

Im pretty sure the Eagles know who was more productive for them last season. Anyway, this topic is stale. Again, Maclin is the better all around WR, and will have the better career when its all said and done, i'd bet anything on it. That's really all there is to it.

Its wise not to bed, since you'd have already lost one. The best WR on the Eagles team last year was the most productive one. Maclin. Not the guy who showed up one game and then disappeared for 3 or 4 games.

Couldn't just be because Manning and Brady are two of the best QB's of all time could it? Nah.. it was all because of a change in pass interference calls. You're actually getting sheep to buy into this theory too. Unreal. Brees set a record in completions? Look how many passes he attempted...

lol One sided to those who are biased. To everyone else, McNabb will clearly be talked about for Hall consideration, and with his stats and accomplishments will most likely be in. McNabb played 4 years before this supposed "Golden Age" btw, which is termed by "cold hard football facts" (a very...

Please enlighten me as to how passing the football dramatically changed from 1999 to 2000. PS- The comment about 1999 to 2006 was a sarcastic exaggeration to mock the fact that you feel passing the football in the NFL changed so dramatically in 5 or 10 years. Same as the remark above. Now, on...