Search results

Amazing how much football changed from 1999 to 2006. Couldn't be the number of pass attempts has gone up. Nah..

lol Yup, knew you wouldn't take the bet. You can talk all you want, but you know who the better WR is and who will have the better career when its all said and done. You'd lose that bet.. because Maclin had the better year last season.

Just because he isn't the focal point doesn't mean he's not a legit threat and someone that other teams worry about. It really all comes down to this.. Maclin was and will continue to be the more consistent and productive WR over the course of both of their careers. Bottom line. Nothing else...

Yada yada yada.. again, Maclin was more productive and consistent last year and will continue to be throughout both men's careers. Put him at number 13 on the depth chart, because i guarentee he's more worried about the numbers that matter on the field.

Bud.. we get it. Jackson is number 1 on the depth chart. Maclin is number 2 on the depth chart. It really doesn't matter a whole heck of alot in terms of production and consistency.. in both those terms, Maclin was clearly better last season, and will continue to be throughout both of their...

Look, passing in the 90's and passing today isn't that different to be completely honest. Its not like they've made hundreds of rule changes since then, and the few they have made have been minor. Its really not a compelling argument. Players on both sides of the ball are bigger, faster, and...

...and again. You call Taylor "inferior". Clayton calls him a "stud". Again, your opinion, and Clayton's.. miles apart.

So you admit then pretty much that Maclin will have the better career. Oh, but Jackson is still holding on to that "number 1 on the depth chart" tag that means oh so much in terms of production, so that's good. lol

QB friendly offense, perhaps. He certainly didn't have the weapons that most HoF QB's have had though.

Who cares if its a run heavy or pass heavy era if they had about the same length of careers and have about the same amount of attemps? They had the same amount of chances to put up numbers in that case. Aikman, Fouts, Jim Kelly, McNabb.. all have around 5,000 attemps for their career.

There was no debate in this thread was there? I said i'll bet anyone 100 bucks that Maclin has the better career. You said "whoa 100 bucks that's alot, blah blah blah." I said "then bet me". You said "Im a pussy blah blah blah..". Am i close? Or would you like to put up that 100 dollars...

Clearly in referring to Jackson as a "superbeast" and Maclin as only a "complimentory WR" you are knocking one guy and building another up to be something way greater than he is. Clayton on the other hand, says that Jackson is nowhere near the talent that Rice was (correct) but that Maclin...

You keep saying that, but i keep showing all the records he's set and/or broken with just purely his stats, and you don't factor in postseason appearances at all either, or the receivers he had to work with.

Oh, and Hasselbeck has a lower ypc average, lower TD/INT ratio, lower QB rating, lower total yards, nowhere near as many postseason appearances, etc, etc.. come on now. Someone please give me some substance as to why McNabb shouldn't even be considered.

Jim Kelly lost 4 consecutive super bowls and he's in..

He adds up with Aikman, and Jim Kelly, and Moon. ..and i did throw a stat out there about active QB's. His winning percentage is third among all of them behind only Peyton and Brady.

By the way, your comment about Maclin being nothing more than a complimentory WR and Jackson being a "superbeast" doesn't really mesh with what Clayton ACTUALLY said in his article. "Jackson clearly isn't Jerry Rice as a talent, but Maclin, as a No. 2 target, reminds you a little of John...

That should be an easy bet for you to take then, huh bud?

He's not overrated when you consider his numbers are on par with or better all the most recent HoF modern era QB's that i already listed, and you factor in that they all had at least one HoF WR to throw to for the majority of their careers. Alot of them had more than one. McNabb had 20 games...

McNabb gets shit on for everything. All the Eagles problems, now this crap in NFL Hell Redskin land was supposedly his fault as well. Show me a few articles where he's given a bunch of credit for anything? Or keep parading around like an imbecile with the talk of how his numbers may match up...