NoMoRedJ

UDFA
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
56
Off topic, but I find this interesting...

Alex Jones is going through a custody jury trial down in Austin, and it's your basic shitshow custody trial. His lawyers have put forth the theory that the jury/judge should disregard what he says and does on his videos and on Infowars, because "he's a performance artist... playing a character." LOL

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/attorney-argues-alex-jones-playing-a-character-in-child-custody-trial/article/2620425

Unfortunately it appears the mother of the children is just as unhinged. She's had limited access to the children recently because of it.

That article doesnt say a whole lot. Interesting though.

Do you know about the mother from another source?
 

NoMoRedJ

UDFA
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
56
Perhaps, but on the scale of 1 to 10 the rest of the world is probably around a 3 and Alex Jones is at least an 8.

Alex might be an 8 but there's a whole bunch of the world that is a lot closer to him than just 3's.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,700
Reaction score
6,033
LOL at Hildahag today. Out there blaming James Comey and Wikileaks for losing the election.

Typical slimeball democrat.

Maybe you stupid kunt you didn't get elected because people saw you for the corrupt, lying piece of shit waste of time that you really are. Maybe that's why you lost.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
If the mother's a head case like you posted earlier then I would say its a toss of the coin for which parent would be better.
I wouldn't pretend I can decide anything from just reading a few articles. What I'm saying is, if I were on the jury and heard all of the evidence, I think I would know what's best for the kids.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,397
Reaction score
3,792
What I'm saying is, if I were on the jury and heard all of the evidence, I think I would know what's best for the kids.
You wouldn't really..... KNOW. You could make a choice - you could make a half intelligent half informed GUESS. Which is more by half than anyone else could make. But you wouldn't and couldn't really KNOW. For sure.
 

NoMoRedJ

UDFA
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
56
I wouldn't pretend I can decide anything from just reading a few articles. What I'm saying is, if I were on the jury and heard all of the evidence, I think I would know what's best for the kids.

I think its all the things that arent known that make it a tough call.

IMO its sad that we have so much of this in our society. Kids are used as pawns while spouses have a pissing contest.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
You wouldn't really..... KNOW. You could make a choice - you could make a half intelligent half informed GUESS. Which is more by half than anyone else could make. But you wouldn't and couldn't really KNOW. For sure.
I would know what my opinion was, which is all that can be expected of a jury.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
I think its all the things that arent known that make it a tough call.
If a juror doesn't know something, then it's either because they shouldn't know that for some specific reason, or because the attorney didn't think you should know it.

IMO its sad that we have so much of this in our society. Kids are used as pawns while spouses have a pissing contest.
I agree with this. And people are getting worse on this, not better.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,397
Reaction score
3,792
I would know what my opinion was, which is all that can be expected of a jury.
Right but, his meter was "you can't really know what's best" and, no one really can. We can make a semi-informed choice based on the evidence, but we can't possibly know.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Right but, his meter was "you can't really know what's best" and, no one really can. We can make a semi-informed choice based on the evidence, but we can't possibly know.
By that meter, you couldn't accomplish 99% of what happens in the judicial system. If that's what he meant, then it was a useless throw away comment. But I don't think that's what he meant.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,397
Reaction score
3,792
If that's what he meant, then it was a useless throw away comment. But I don't think that's what he meant.
Don't know myself 100 percent, if that's what he meant either. I made a choice based on the context.
By that meter, you couldn't accomplish 99% of what happens in the judicial system.
Sure we can, and do. Jurors decide when asked then worry if they were right, later. But they all know even if it's just deep down, they don't really KNOW. And I'm talking specifically in the stated arena of, "what's best for the kids."
 
Top Bottom