Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,399
Reaction score
3,794
One Communist fucktard down, about a million more or so to go.

Yeah it was a PRIMARY loss too. Own party rubs her out. So it's likely a MORE commie candidate not less.
 

InternetKing

The Elite :-P
Messages
3,513
Reaction score
714
Why not? Republicans challenge their sitting president every time. Think about that for a half second. Are you able to?
I mean I never seen a sitting president since Washington to now that got removed when he/she is running to be re-elected in their own party.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,399
Reaction score
3,794
I mean I never seen a sitting president since Washington to now that got removed when he/she is running to be re-elected in their own party.
Would have happened with LBJ had he not stepped down from running. RFK was gonna primary him. They hated Johnson with every fiber of their being. The Kennedy's were Boston, LBJ was Austin.

It hasn't happened but it'll never happen in the Dimwit party because they don't even run primaries against a sitting Dimwit president.

Dim party though, just now ousted a sitting Dim mayor of a major city so maybe they've changed.

If they think their incumbent might lose in the general election they might primary them. Looks like could be happening with old Joe.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,975
Reaction score
6,142
I thought cant do that since Biden is running for re-election....
There's nothing to prevent anyone from trying to primary a President looking for a 2nd term. But it's considered hugely damaging for the party if their guy in office is so unpopular that others see an opportunity to actually beat him and that's why even if there are murmurs about it, it usually fizzles out before election seasons gets started. The party can also deter someone from trying to primary the Pres by withholding (or threatening to anyway) national funding.

That said, Biden is so unpopular and so incompetent that there clearly ARE many Dems who would probably prefer he just step aside and cite age and health concerns.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,975
Reaction score
6,142
By the way, how do you admit you stole an election without admitting you stole the election.

Your party KNOWS they need to replace the guy that just got a USA record of "81 million votes"
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
4,708
Reaction score
3,515


From CNBC reporting:

Sun. 11am:

Former FDIC Chair Sheila Bair said Sunday that finding a buyer for SVB is “the best outcome.”
Bair said the FDIC could help companies with payroll in the case that there’s a systemic risk exception, which would be “an extraordinary procedure.” She said she thinks it is going to be “hard to say that this is systemic in any way.”

Sun. 6pm:

The Treasury Department designated both SVB and Signature as systemic risks, giving it authority to unwind both institutions in a way that it said “fully protects all depositors.” The FDIC’s deposit insurance fund will be used to cover depositors, many of whom were uninsured due to the $250,000 cap on guaranteed deposits.

Along with that move, the Federal Reserve also said it is creating a new Bank Term Funding Program aimed at safeguarding institutions affected by the market instability of the SVB failure.

A joint statement from the various regulators involved said there would be no bailouts and no taxpayer costs associated with any of the new plans. Shareholders and some unsecured creditors will not be protected and will lose all of their investments.

“Today we are taking decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system,” said a joint statement from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg.

The Fed facility will offer loans of up to one year to banks, saving associations, credit unions and other institutions. Those taking advantage of the facility will be asked to pledge high-quality collateral such as Treasurys, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities.


From the AP:

In a separate announcement, the Fed late Sunday announced an expansive emergency lending program that’s intended to prevent a wave of bank runs that would threaten the stability of the banking system and the economy as a whole. Fed officials characterized the program as akin to what central banks have done for decades: Lend freely to the banking system so that customers would be confident that they could access their accounts whenever needed.

The lending facility will allow banks that need to raise cash to pay depositors to borrow that money from the Fed, rather than having to sell Treasuries and other securities to raise the money. Silicon Valley Bank had been forced to dump some of its Treasuries at at a loss to fund its customers’ withdrawals. Under the Fed’s new program, banks can post those securities as collateral and borrow from the emergency facility.

The Treasury has set aside $25 billion to offset any losses incurred under the Fed’s emergency lending facility. Fed officials said, however, that they do not expect to have to use any of that money, given that the securities posted as collateral have a very low risk of default.

Analysts said the Fed’s program should be enough to calm financial markets on Monday.

 

Dodger12

Super Moderator
Messages
7,069
Reaction score
3,779


From CNBC reporting:

Sun. 11am:

Former FDIC Chair Sheila Bair said Sunday that finding a buyer for SVB is “the best outcome.”
Bair said the FDIC could help companies with payroll in the case that there’s a systemic risk exception, which would be “an extraordinary procedure.” She said she thinks it is going to be “hard to say that this is systemic in any way.”

Sun. 6pm:

The Treasury Department designated both SVB and Signature as systemic risks, giving it authority to unwind both institutions in a way that it said “fully protects all depositors.” The FDIC’s deposit insurance fund will be used to cover depositors, many of whom were uninsured due to the $250,000 cap on guaranteed deposits.

Along with that move, the Federal Reserve also said it is creating a new Bank Term Funding Program aimed at safeguarding institutions affected by the market instability of the SVB failure.

A joint statement from the various regulators involved said there would be no bailouts and no taxpayer costs associated with any of the new plans. Shareholders and some unsecured creditors will not be protected and will lose all of their investments.

“Today we are taking decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system,” said a joint statement from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg.

The Fed facility will offer loans of up to one year to banks, saving associations, credit unions and other institutions. Those taking advantage of the facility will be asked to pledge high-quality collateral such as Treasurys, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities.


From the AP:

In a separate announcement, the Fed late Sunday announced an expansive emergency lending program that’s intended to prevent a wave of bank runs that would threaten the stability of the banking system and the economy as a whole. Fed officials characterized the program as akin to what central banks have done for decades: Lend freely to the banking system so that customers would be confident that they could access their accounts whenever needed.

The lending facility will allow banks that need to raise cash to pay depositors to borrow that money from the Fed, rather than having to sell Treasuries and other securities to raise the money. Silicon Valley Bank had been forced to dump some of its Treasuries at at a loss to fund its customers’ withdrawals. Under the Fed’s new program, banks can post those securities as collateral and borrow from the emergency facility.

The Treasury has set aside $25 billion to offset any losses incurred under the Fed’s emergency lending facility. Fed officials said, however, that they do not expect to have to use any of that money, given that the securities posted as collateral have a very low risk of default.

Analysts said the Fed’s program should be enough to calm financial markets on Monday.



We've become Europe in every aspect of our society. From our socialist economy, to healthcare, to customer service, to banking, to selective prosecutions, to political persecutions, to open borders, etc. We're trying to charge a former president for his business dealings because one of his execs used a company car improperly in a billion dollar business while these shills sell their stock when they realize their bank is going under. You'd think some regulators would look at this and charge them but they won't.

Our country is toast. And it's never coming back.
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
4,708
Reaction score
3,515
You can read up on her career, a past (Clinton Appointed) Federal Reserve Chairman herself...

Janet Yellen - Wikipedia

Supposed to be VERY SMART people running the Fed.

"Unintended Consequences" . . .
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
4,708
Reaction score
3,515
This guy, Patrick Boyle, explains how SVB for some inexplicable reason did not hedge against interest rate volatility.

"A number of things went wrong at Silicon Valley Bank over the last days, weeks and years, there were huge failures of risk management. The risk manager would have some tough questions to answer, except that it appears that they didn’t have a risk manager on staff for almost nine months of the last year."

 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,975
Reaction score
6,142
Pence is a fucking piece of shit. One of Trump's biggest mistakes (in fact, surrounding himself with too many really awful people was probably the one thing Trump didn't do right as President)
 
Top Bottom