Riverboat Jason? Gamblin’ Garrett? Cowboys coach shows aggressiveness in Senior Bowl

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
BY DREW DAVISON
ddavison@star-telegram.com

MOBILE, ALA.

It’s safe to say Jason Garrett is more of a conservative coach on Sundays. He’s not someone who takes big-time risks, or calls trick plays very often.

But Garrett showed he isn’t afraid to roll the dice a little bit during the Senior Bowl on Saturday. Granted, it’s an all-star collegiate game with little at stake.

Still, it was interesting to see Garrett go for it on a fourth-and-three from his own 27 with less than a minute remaining in the first quarter. The Senior Bowl treats every quarter as a separate half, attempting to give every quarterback a chance to run the two-minute offense.

Garrett’s North squad failed to get the first down in that situation, as North Dakota State’s Carson Wentz threw an incomplete pass to Ohio State’s Braxton Miller that could have been caught.

In the third quarter, the North Team blocked a field goal and had a first-and-goal at the 5 with six seconds left. The first down play, which drew a defensive pass interference, left two seconds on the clock and put the ball on the 1.

With the North team trailing 20-10 at the time, a field goal would have made it a one-possession game. But Garrett opted to go for it, and USC’s Cody Kessler couldn’t connect with Miller.

“Yeah, we were a little aggressive, and I think a big part of that was to evaluate the guys,” Garrett said. “How do they handle a fourth-and-3 at the 27? How do they handle the last play of the third quarter when you’re inside the 1-yard line, who is going to make a play? Who is going to respond the right way?

“Again, that goes to the evaluation as well. We’re also trying to win the game.”

Read more here: Riverboat Jason? Gamblin’ Garrett? Cowboys coach shows aggressiveness in Senior Bowl | The Star-Telegram
 

boozeman

Draft Pick
Messages
3,859
Reaction score
0
Total bullshit.

Garrett only gambles in worthless games, like he did with the stupid fake punt against the Redskins.



And of course, he revels in appearing to be smart and edgy.


Otherwise, he's a gutless crap head who would take a FG anyday.

Just like he did against Seattle.

Sorry, Red Pube, players rally around coaches when they gamble, put their nuts out there and ya know, actually win.

That is how Rivera turned his rep around in Carolina. He showed faith in his players and took the gambles when it mattered.

It is comical how it is being publicized what he did in a meaningless All-Star game...THAT HE LOST ANYWAY.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Yeah, we were a little aggressive, and I think a big part of that was to evaluate the guys,” Garrett said. “How do they handle a fourth-and-3 at the 27?

Like booze said... This is absolutely ridiculous. You're going to evaluate them on one play in a dumb situation like this?

More likely Captain Clap heard all the complaints about how conservative he was and thought he'd try to improve his rep. In a meaningless college all star game.

And I can just see the smug overconfident look on his face as he said this, too.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
The Garrett fan boys will literally say anything.

A few years from now, they will be "remember that year Garrett sandbagged the season to get Carson Wentz ...he outsmarted everyone."
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
So, are we not taking into account that the Senior Bowl is formatted so that each quarter is treated like it's the end of a half? He didn't fucking gamble. He went for it with no time left like it was the end of the half. GTFO with this nonsense.
 

boozeman

Draft Pick
Messages
3,859
Reaction score
0
Like booze said... This is absolutely ridiculous. You're going to evaluate them on one play in a dumb situation like this?

More likely Captain Clap heard all the complaints about how conservative he was and thought he'd try to improve his rep. In a meaningless college all star game.

And I can just see the smug overconfident look on his face as he said this, too.

He has always been a thin-skinned reactionary twat. I also think he is arrogant in that he believes his offensive designs work, which is why he continually stresses "execution". They don't work all the time and he is far too inflexible and stubborn to ever think outside the box.

I know the robot thing is out there but I disagree. I think he indeed reacts to criticism.

He even did it when he was a coordinator.

I remember when we blew a game to Green Bay in 2009. We lost that game 17-7 after we had a 40-8 pass/run ratio. The media was all over his ass because he did not run the ball more.

The next week in an "I'll show 'em" move, he runs the ball 37 times against the Redskins. We barely win 7-6 only because Romo pulled it out of his ass on the last drive.

Now he is still out to appear edgy and clever.

Sorry, he fails at that too. He is such a fraud it is kind of sickening to watch.

He is not a genuine guy at all.

The concept that he presents one face to the media and another to the team, well, I think players can get with that for only so long. I guess he plays the "us versus them" thing, I have no idea.

But all in all, motivating is not the same as simply coaching smarter and beating the other guys.

Do players respect Belichick because he motivates? No, they revere him and follow him because they know for a fact he can outwork and outwit anybody.

Garrett? He instills a cultist type of environment. He will get rid of those that don't buy in.

The Cult of Personality is great when you win. When you lose, you lose the bottom belly of the roster that sometimes makes the difference. That is "losing the locker room". Every team has their Romos and Wittens that are the coach's lieutenants and lackeys that will be company men and toe the line. That does not speak a damn thing to me.
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
He has always been a thin-skinned reactionary twat. I also think he is arrogant in that he believes his offensive designs work, which is why he continually stresses "execution". They don't work all the time and he is far too inflexible and stubborn to ever think outside the box.

I know the robot thing is out there but I disagree. I think he indeed reacts to criticism.

He even did it when he was a coordinator.

I remember when we blew a game to Green Bay in 2009. We lost that game 17-7 after we had a 40-8 pass/run ratio. The media was all over his ass because he did not run the ball more.

The next week in an "I'll show 'em" move, he runs the ball 37 times against the Redskins. We barely win 7-6 only because Romo pulled it out of his ass on the last drive.

Now he is still out to appear edgy and clever.

Sorry, he fails at that too. He is such a fraud it is kind of sickening to watch.

He is not a genuine guy at all.

The concept that he presents one face to the media and another to the team, well, I think players can get with that for only so long. I guess he plays the "us versus them" thing, I have no idea.

But all in all, motivating is not the same as simply coaching smarter and beating the other guys.

Do players respect Belichick because he motivates? No, they revere him and follow him because they know for a fact he can outwork and outwit anybody.

Garrett? He instills a cultist type of environment. He will get rid of those that don't buy in.

The Cult of Personality is great when you win. When you lose, you lose the bottom belly of the roster that sometimes makes the difference. That is "losing the locker room". Every team has their Romos and Wittens that are the coach's lieutenants and lackeys that will be company men and toe the line. That does not speak a damn thing to me.

Spot on, Booze. Props.
 

boozeman

Draft Pick
Messages
3,859
Reaction score
0
Lookit, a coach has to have buy in and should get rid of guys that do not. But we have seen varying examples where it is apparent that he may be getting them to buy into bad concepts.

It is cool to brainwash a roster, but if what you are doing is fostering your bad philosophies, what good does it do?

Try hard, fight, battle, sure all cool when you are massively undermanned. I don't think the talent Garrett has been given to work with has been any worse than many others. They certainly do not over achieve. They have been held back by his systems and core beliefs about conceptual football. He thinks it works. The results say he needs luck for it to work more than half the time.
 

bvhawkeye

In the Rotation
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
Garrett is the most vanilla, conservative, chicken shit play caller I've ever seen in the NFL.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
Garrett is the most vanilla, conservative, chicken shit play caller I've ever seen in the NFL.

Yep not even ONE pass on 2nd and short. 3rd and 2? Yep, run the ball. This was yesterday. Over and over.

Garrett isn't any gambler, he is "risk averse" playing not to lose instead of playing to win. And the results on the scoreboard typically reflect that.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
This is so bizarre. If Garrett shows an attribute that any and all coaches have like: calling effective plays to win a series or game, making his own team internally competitive, keeping his team positive or some sort of novel way to get accountability, - he treats it with a sense of original discovery and gives some speech like he's running for government office based on his discovery of that coaching technique. The bottom line is he is so naive and under-equipped to be an NFL coach, that it's almost enough for him just to wear the big boy clothes of a head coach and talk about all the stuff that he does rather than just letting his wins and gains speak for themselves.

Can you imagine Belichick, Carroll, Tomlin, McCarthy or even Arians, blurting his own praise about play calling, because any of those coaches would not call that "aggressive" they would call it "plays" or "trying to win". Most coaches don't want to share how they motivate or keep their players loyal, but Jason, the summer camp director, gives a press release about how he "keeps track of individual competitions" (I think the winner gets tickets to the cantina for Pop Rocks, Twizzlers, or a free Manwich).

Even Ron Rivera stands there and you have no idea if he is a master strategist or a mannequin but, either way, you won't know outright that he is a twit and you won't know what he is doing with and for his team to win games. Garrett thinks the press conferences are pats on his own back, whether he is explaining a loss or, even sadder, explaining an improbable victory, to show everybody what he is discovering every week and every season about his own job description.
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,903
Reaction score
4,950
Total bullshit.

Garrett only gambles in worthless games, like he did with the stupid fake punt against the Redskins.

Lol, thats what I was thinking.

It ain't gambling if you have nothing to lose
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
Lol, thats what I was thinking.

It ain't gambling if you have nothing to lose

And it ain't a boast worthy attribute to having a division winning team with nothing to play for beating you because your 5'9" weak armed QB threw 2 interceptions and fumbled into the second quarter and with the score 21-0, but then that division winning team takes out their starters and starts putting in random depth players and suddenly the weak armed QB gets completions and yards - still lost the game but hold the phone, if Dallas plays the entire next season against teams from the Special Olympics, then we got ourselves a QB in Kellen Moore for next year.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,343
Reaction score
11,247
So, are we not taking into account that the Senior Bowl is formatted so that each quarter is treated like it's the end of a half? He didn't fucking gamble. He went for it with no time left like it was the end of the half. GTFO with this nonsense.

Yep
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
If you are really going to evaluate the QB's wouldn't you want them flinging it down field? Let's see what these kids have. Let's see how good their arms are. Zero imagination in the play calling.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Yep not even ONE pass on 2nd and short. 3rd and 2? Yep, run the ball. This was yesterday. Over and over.

Garrett isn't any gambler, he is "risk averse" playing not to lose instead of playing to win. And the results on the scoreboard typically reflect that.


Last year against the Redskins in OT, Murray rips off an 8 yard run. It's 2nd and 2. Garrett doesn't run, he calls a pass. Incomplete. 3rd and 2. Pass. Incomplete. 4th and 2. Pass. Incomplete. Game over. He was an idiot on that possession. Cost us the #1 seed basically.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
Last year against the Redskins in OT, Murray rips off an 8 yard run. It's 2nd and 2. Garrett doesn't run, he calls a pass. Incomplete. 3rd and 2. Pass. Incomplete. 4th and 2. Pass. Incomplete. Game over. He was an idiot on that possession. Cost us the #1 seed basically.
It DOES depend on what formation you use and what pass you call. As i recall this sequence, Murray wasn't on the field for the passes and none of them were play action.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
It DOES depend on what formation you use and what pass you call. As i recall this sequence, Murray wasn't on the field for the passes and none of them were play action.

Exactly. 2nd down and 2 after an 8 yard run sets up huge options with that RB on the field. But Bozo takes him off the field and or out of the backfield so teams can tee off on Romo without concern for possible future 8 yard runs.
 

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,979
Reaction score
6,267
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1454363434.959733.jpg

Aww how cute, Carrot Top is excited for Ware to play in the Super Bowl

Now we know how a Garret coached player can get the opportunity to play in the big game

All they have to do is be traded to another team
 
Top Bottom