At least be consistent. What's funny to me is that you guys (Republicans on this board) have a win at all costs approach to politics but then you nonstop excuse Jerry's bullshit running the Cowboys the last 25 years. It's like you want to be sheep and are willing to justify anything that supports your ideology or worldview.
Why do you make an statement that doesn't exist and then formulate your argument around that? I mean, we have a Jerry death watch thread. We've tried to recruit martyr pilots to fly his choppers and planes.....We've had bad thoughts about his yacht sinking.....I mean, how much lower do we have to go? Not many folks around here support Jerry and make exuses for him. Far from it. This isn't CZ.
McConnell and the Republicans literally just prevented the previous President from appointing a new Justice in his last few months and now all of you are demanding that Trump be allowed to appoint one, even closer to the election.
That would be a negative. President Obama nominated Garland but the Republicans controlled the Senate. That's politics, whether you like it or not. Nothing prevents Trump from nominating a SCOTUS and he should, just like Obama did. Something like 14 SCOTUS's have been confirmed in an election year. More have been nominated.
If Trump wins the election in less than 2 months, no issues from me. I'm not thrilled about his potential selection but it's within his rights at that point.
Trump is President for another few months. He'll make a nomination. That shouldn't surprise you. But don't take it from me. Take it from your hero: