she has gone berserk lately obsessing on all things jewish and then there's this subject:
My wife had this on last night so I got a chance to catch it. First, She can't go a show without mentioning Jews in some capacity. Now she is on this thing about Sigmund Freud being involved in some Jewish cult or something and his ideas on psychoanalysis are somehow designed to draw people into the cult or make them susceptible to something or other. She uses books to back her claims, and by that I mean she waves them for the camera. But it is clear to me she cherry picks the books that support her claims of Jewish evilness.
But what really struck me is this moral dilemma she claimed to be having over this story that Trump called her to ask her not to talk about Brigitte Marcon being a man because her husband supposedly told Trump he would not help work out a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia as long as Owens continued to talk about his wife. If find this hard to believe but when presented with the choice by Trump Candace struggled over giving up her first amendment right to talk about Macron, or peace in Ukraine. Does Candace really believe her right to gossip is more important that saving the lives of thousands of people in Ukraine and Russia? This is her moral dilemma?
I get it, if Marcon proposed this to Trump he is as bad as her. But still, it was presented to Candace and her struggle, even for 5 seconds, revealed how crazy she has gotten.
And by the way, she claims she has proof that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man. Why Macron has not sued her is a mystery but it could be the leader of France does not want to lower himself to a tabloid journalist's level.
