Search results

Frank Gorshin.

An unicorn?

Article doesn't mention that in the scrimmage, Scandrick also got a pick off a pass Romo says he was throwing away but just didn't get enough on.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2150070-redditor-releases-most-hated-nfl-teams-in-each-state My preference is to just see the whole thing a Dallas star. But only the northeast really hates Dallas? Can't be.

Well if he has been more or less the GM he hasn't done a very good job.

But he was damn sharp in the scrimmage itself.

You're still assuming I am attacking the Boy Blunder. When I am actually attacking the clown in charge, Jerry, and his assortment of yes men. For the folks who like to claim "without Romo we would be 1-15" and such, it's simply never happened. Somehow we manage to stay, 8-8. Without Romo for a...

It would be the end of Romo hating, everywhere. Just like with Favre even though he is the NFL all-time turnover machine.

I hope this means what I think it means and I hope you're right. Because if Dallas gets to play 19 games that count, one of those is the Super Bowl and it's also with a really good record since that represents a bye week in the playoffs. And you are also correct, that if that happens myself and...

That's "A" idiot. Not "an." Irony alert! :neenerneener

But truly, after seeing the zip he has on the ball and the movement he showed in the video I linked before, I am less and less worried about his back. And if he doesn't play Thursday in San Diego, I got no problem with that either. No sense risking him in preseason.

.500 is not the doldrums? But see? This is the crap I'm talking about. No doubt if Romo went out for the season starting tomorrow, and Dallas still wound up 8-8, you would be talking about how oh shucky darn, if only Tony hadn't gone down we woulda been 13-3.

I am saying we are 8-8 with him, we'll be 8-8 at least, without him. I'm not blaming HIM for being 8-8 the last three years, or playing .500 ball since 1997. That's your Freudian projection not mine. Suffice it to say I reply such in response to the lameass "without Romo we would be 1-15" crap...

No, man... For 55 million we get coin toss odds.

No he does not. Doomsday says it really doesn't matter who is under center, you are what you are as the Tuna says. 8-8.

He's always shown himself to be scrappy.

The team is 8-8 the last three years straight. It is .500 since 1997. It is .500 when Romo is hurt and not playing.

Wonder what he said no too.

Romo looking pretty healthy and pretty good in the clips from the scrimmage at this link where he's interviewed: http://www.dallascowboys.com/multimedia/videos/Tony-Romo-Thoughts-On-Blue-And-White-Scrimmage/48c933f3-0ecc-44df-aa4c-bd17b2d73bb5 Scandrick picked off one of his passes he says he...

Please get me some inside news on my fellow alumnus Dustin Vaughan. How's he doing in camp, impressing anyone?