Search results

:rolfanim You're a parody of yourself now.

If you take the time to actually read, you'll know what you're talking about. I never said or even hinted that Bates should be in the Ring for his play at safety. And that's what's being dishonestly asserted.

So no doubt you oppose Haley's inclusion.

Nuff said then.

I don't. That's Redball and Jerry's name for it. It's their coinage. That's correct but it seemed really weird to see someone focused on the offensive line in the post I replied to. Quoted again below:

And it's retroactive too. Militant gays are backreading social media to see if any NFL player EVER posted a slur or anything that could remotely be considered a slur.

Maybe you should consult the RoH charter. There's nothing in it which resembles this.

Hey, watch the Gay slurs.:razz

And instead, concentrating on making the offense more "Romo Friendly." And my answer to that was, "Offensive line wasn't anything close to the problem injury wise the defensive line was. Offensive line has been pretty good actually. But yeah, with three first round picks in it, it really SHOULD...

That's why it's been working hard to make the offense more "Romo Friendly" for the last five years or so. Their words, not mine.

You believe it should be only just for big stars who scored alot of touchdowns. Yes, because it is employed so often by so many weak minded morons. Calling them on it isn't the problem, that the morons continue to employ it, is.

They were addressing different ideas, not the same one as is your claim. Anyone can check it and see you're just a dishonest broker. That's actually about the third time I've said that. Know what special teams headhunters are? Invented to stop Bates. And weren't very effective against him but...

That's subjective. When in actuality, they grade out pretty decent. The O-line is far from your worst problem. If they can be only half as banged up as last year that alone would be a big help.

Maybe he's considered more "Romo Friendly."

You're basing this on how many sacks the quarterbacks took, or the less than stellar running game? Hopefully we'll find that out.

Then you're just stupid. When people stop employing the straw fallacy, I'll stop pointing it out. You don't understand it, and feel left out. It's okay, you have access to all the world's information at your fingertips. All you need do is choose to use it.

You know that's incorrect. That's your straw account. My actual argument has been stated many times and you have had zero answer for it, so you have to pretend, and address a argument I never made.. Pointing out Bates is considered by the organization a top ten safety was and only ever is, the...

Offensive line wasn't anything close to the problem injury wise the defensive line was. Offensive line has been pretty good actually. But yeah, with three first round picks in it, it really SHOULD be good.

Or even if we DO watch out! :eek

I did not. The Dallas Cowboys did.