Search results

Oh I hate that. I was hoping for a NFC title game at Lambeau.

Because that was his stats. 19-79. Why would they EVER have Weeden throwing 33 times? 3rd down efficiency exposed this defense though, offense was only 3/11 and Arizona rolls up 400 yards. You didn't feed Murray the ball, and you lost.

The bolded part, nobody ever said. The rest of it is quite true and your Arizona game is a good example of it. 33 pass attempts for.... Weeden and Murray's touches waaaaay down? The liability for Tony that's been most limited? The amount of hits he's had to take.

Might have done so if they would have let him have more than 19 carries.

My vote's been for Watt. Doubt he would win though.

I seriously doubt it.

Murray did more than he ever has or has ever been asked to do. Many many more touches.

My agenda is, dudes who actually do MORE have a better case for MVP than dudes who do less. That's all. Doesn't matter the dudes involved.

Especially not ones you might be facing in the playoffs.

This. He has the best case for winning this than any of the other candidates.

Hey Man, he is the head coach. He took his team from the 8-8 doldrums to the heights of 12-4. Won four more games than last year, by doing less. All the other candidates for this, did more. Therefore Garrett should win.

Even worse than that, getting to the NFC title game and losing. Especially three years in a row.

That just seems like a qual for a award, is all.

Me too. What with his reduced role and all.

Four more wins than last year. With only a few breaks here and there, last year's team could have done that too. And the year before. And the year before.

Hell, might could wind up a Cowboy next year!

Right and NONE of those had the head coach neutered.

But..... He's had to do less. Less is moar!

LOL +1

But.... But.... We are 12-4 and he's done lesssss. That seems to be the qual.