Search results

I think most of those guys disappeared from here shortly after Romo disappeared from our roster. But truly, I don't remember the angst or the gnashing of teeth. We really really needed a running back.

Hell, Jacksonville might just cut his ass. That might actually be what he's shooting for.

Dodger it's good that Dak had a great game but definitely true it could have been a better one. But the thing is, truly he does hold the ball too long. I'm wondering if that's better than hurried panicky throws that result in bonehead picks. Getting rid of it just to avoid a sack. I'm wondering...

You guys should have posted your locations here, during the game. Y'all could have met!

Well. If he'll dog it like that because he's unhappy, or dog it for any reason really, he's poison for most decision makers. He's not helping his case or his resume. And might well find himself stuck there through the end of his rookie deal, even if it's just benchwarming, if nobody wants to...

LOL Yeah. Now you're talkin. But for the wildcard game, you do NOT want Philly. By the way: The week 3, 24-13 loss to Seattle? Was AT Seattle where they seldom ever lose, and we were in the midst of our 3-5 start - without Cooper and when this defense hadn't jelled yet. Marinelli was still...

But.... We'd already beaten them twice that year. Relevant to your infantile argument. You think two wins over Philly, one of those in overtime, means we have a better chance to win the third meet? I bet you believe that if a coin comes up heads the first two times you toss it, that the chances...

Wait, we're back to who we like our chances better against? You would rather face a division opponent that is super bowl champion, who is very familiar with us, has a big chip on its shoulder and who oh by the way hates us, than a team that now, today, we match up very well against and who away...

LOL My apologies Scot. I now see the valid reason you have, for wanting Philly here for the playoff game and not Seattle. You were choosing the one that would be less painful for you, to see us lose to! You were never arguing who you thought we had a better chance against! I misunderstood...

LOL I hope you know I'm kidding. Although I do wish a horrid, painful, lingering suffering death on Jerry I really wouldn't want any Universor to be the killer. Or even to commit an act of violence against him.

And/or.... make sure they don't get anything for him in said trade? It might not.... Who's gonna want to trade anything of value for that guy? Who's going to want to pay that guy? He's just hurting himself.

Right, and then I pointed out that same thing happened to us in 2007. Remember what you said after that? It was, "Uhh, yeah, well... The coach! Yeah our bad coach means we lose!" Which wasn't the argument. The argument was, Eagles or Seattle. Which one do you like our chances better against...

You were in the same building with Jerry, Stephen and Ginger. And nobody died?

And that statement stands on its own and wasn't part of the debate that ensued after. Nobody was arguing that at any point, ever. You're being intentionally obtuse. Because after I said I would rather see Seattle, YOU entered that debate saying you would rather have the Eagles. YOU were debating...

Gruden didn't trade anyone, the Raiders GM did, reportedly because those two players have the same agent and that GM didn't like the agent. The GM was fired.

You didn't "simplify" anything, you just modified the argument. If you believe we're losing no matter what, then of course the opponent doesn't matter. But that's not what the debate topic was. The debate was, who do you think we have a better chance against, and you said Philly. Unable to...

You don't wanna see them in the playoffs either. Smart man.

Third different thing you've said, as the reason "the opponent doesn't matter." Backpedaling and wiggling the goalposts around, trying to fit that illogical square peg into the rational round hole. When the fact is, the opponent DOES matter. A lot. Especially when one is very familiar with you...

Just like the Giants in 07. We swept them then they beat us in the playoffs. Things have changed in Philly. It's not anywhere near the team it was. Perhaps you haven't been watching them. I'd much rather see Seattle. Don't want to see Philly.

Yeah well, it DOES make a difference who the playoff opponent is and it DOES matter the venue. It's the playoffs. And you can win playoff games and still not dominate them.