Search results

32 beats a 16 and a 9 by miles though. Just saying too.

Dez was a no-show as expected, at the mandatory minicamp today. Condon said today on the Sirius radio NFL show, expect Desmond to hold out at least two regular season games if he doesn't get a long term deal. He signs the franchise tender but then holds out, and the reality is he can hold out...

We see now why you think that. Not paying attention to what is actually being posted. I have never "devalued" Dez in fact it is just the opposite - I don't believe we can afford the kind of contract he is going to be able to command. We can make him play under the tag this year, and next if...

Who's doing that? MY position is, I question if we can afford him and if not, we will live. It's not the end of the world, not the end of our offense and not the end of the passing game.

And besides that, before I bought this site the Boys went 8-8, three straight. New owner here, and POOF! 12-4! And you just KNOW that is due to Carrot Top, Jeruh and a lot of the players reading our posts here Men! What do you think all these tapatalk users are who never post, but are always...

Hardly. I suppose if you skip all the times I was saying we needed to draft a wideout in the first round you might be able to be saying that without outright lying about it. I never said or even insinuated Desmond was "easily replaceable" nor ever thought it. Lead the way dicknose. Practice...

See, I have this weird theory whereas if Desmond isn't there, we won't be trying to throw to him. Instead we will be throwing to other people who are wearing a star on their hat. It's just a theory, mind you.

Be sure to point me to where that was ever said, I'll wait. We can live without him. People will still catch passes - it's always happened. It's nothing to get so pissy about. You do understand this possibility of Desmond leaving is so remote, pigs might fly out of your ass first right?

It's LESS of that. Less of a echo chamber.

What, you're the "word use" poe-leese now? LOL At least I knew that's his real name.

Right. :hypt They'd probably ban people there, for trying to recruit to another board. If you don't like it here just hit the "log out" button and never return. Sheik wanted to sell it for a reason - it had become a boring echo chamber and he was sick of it. Well it ain't anymore. Don't like...

The only reason it is? Because hand wringers such as you are soooo afraid of even the most far-off remote possibility we might be without Desmond, you can't wrap your mind around the simple fact we will be able to live just fine without him. You're into some cult worshippy shit, or something.

Desmond is his actual name, s0n. And NO, Desmond could NOT "do what Dez does to the level he does it" (your words) in his second year. You're a idiot for even suggesting that.

DING DING DING

Nobody said that. I am saying losing Desmond isn't the end of the world, or even the end of Dallas' passing game.

Could Dez, in his second year? Nuff said. Love all the hand wringing though, at this extreme outside possibility we might lose Desmond.

Yep and teams are just beating down his door to sign him away from us. Not.

I guess you missed Statman's post showing we had 1000 yard receivers before Dez and during Dez.... We can live without Dez. We will still throw the ball. People will still catch it. We've always spread the ball around, we will continue to do so. I am FAR more worried about life without Romo...

So what? Without Dez they'll have to adjust and figure out why we're torching them with other guys. When I was calling for this, you should have seen the wails and howls. I still think it's a good idea if we can get the right deal for him.

So, you believe Tony just won't have anyone to throw to, there won't be a 1,000 yard receiver, although as Statman showed earlier, there always has been. The offense just collapses without Dez, right? C'mon now. Really makes me want to see him hold out or get signed by another team. But, no...