Search results

Then you better damn well not play him anymore. Because he's just gonna get busted up again, and trade value sinks more. "Deserves" what? The 100 million we're giving him. He doesn't "deserve" to just walk right back into the job any more than Dak "deserves" to be benched.

Except, Dak has the ability and knows when, to take off running.

No they did not. He began a sexual assault relationship with the minor. She has no ability to give consent.

Is it working out any better now?

Correct.

ORRRRR the 200 that was originally cackled about in this thread, which is what started the whole conversation about how strong GB's run defense really is.

I like our chances, even in Lambeau. But it's not homer, it's logic. And yeah the 90s Cowboys weren't afraid to win ugly. The good teams do that.

Wow it's surprising one game makes that much difference in the per-game averages. Of course the sample is small, only 5 games so that's why. Great job researching and calculating all of this, really cool and i really appreciate it.

Here's my logic:

There's no need for that, since the quoted portion of TE's post covers your theory: "FWIW, Football Outsiders has GB as the #2 run defense in the league, even adjusted for opponent."

When was this, ever?

That is not what you said. You said we would gain more than 200 yards rushing on them. I do have a PayPal but there is no bet and really no dispute. Of course we should do better than the 50 they allow. I'd bet that in a heartbeat. I've bolded the highly relevant part of your most intelligent...

When the opponent has 2 touchdowns called back by bonehead penalties, and has a safety scored against it from still another bonehead penalty, and has almost as many penalty yards as it does offensive total yards at the time of the 18 point deficit in the 4th quarter, after all the bonehead...

So, no contest right? Might as well just give Dallas the WIN and save a trip to Wisconsin! LOL Advanced Tip: When a run defense holds 5 NFL opponents to 50 yards or fewer rushing yards each, it ain't a fluke, it's not that those teams can't run the ball. That's dominant run defense. This is the...

Certainly they haven't faced our OL in its full snot-slinger mode yet this season. Should be fun to watch.

I am a little more worried about the Rodgers-Nelson connection shredding our secondary. But not a lot more worried, GB should be able to do both run and pass, with impunity. My only real question is can we go tit for tat.

No one said GB wouldn't allow 100 or 200. You said Dallas would get 200. See the difference?

Need a hitman at safety and he seems to fit the bill. We've never come close to replacing Woody.

Probably not.

So, he need only get hurt again for you to be ready to move on. The stellar play of his young and healthy replacement notwithstanding. I don't "feel" that, I believe that intellectually - especially after seeing his last play, where he could not run, and was crushed, mid-slide. The dude cannot...