Search results

Here's what REALLY happened, i called it months ago: My script for a TV commercial coming soon

You would believe Ginger made a unilateral decision of such import, without consulting the Jones boys? It's a silly thought. It is FAR more likely there was discussion. And THATS just a rumor. Just as unsubstantiated as this bullshit article.

I certainly never said that. I don't think it was anything like what's in this Garrett-fanboi article though. I well imagine it was discussed with the Jones boys at length before any decision was made. Jerruh is paying this fuck Romo 100 mil - there is NO way any coach just says "sorry boss...

We also learned Garrett can STILL fuck up a season with one toweringly bad, idiotic decision. "Yes, let's spike the ball instead of running a play and possibly icing the game by scoring a touchdown, let's just play for the FG and make sure Aaron Rodgers still has enough time to beat us."

Plausible I suppose, but Taylor cites no sources at all so this is all just conjecture. Nobody's quoted at all, gives it the smell of bullshit. It's just his own opinion.

Charles Haley style. Coming up big in big situations in big games. The old Harvey Martin thing. "Sacks are still sacks" yeah, but interceptions are still interceptions too. But timing is everything as far as real impact on the game. No argument from me here. But like i said, i like the sacks to...

It's really all about the timing ain't it?

Or even, overly bright.

I always hated this smarmy brainless fuck.

For when you want to shoot yourself in the foot? :rofl2

I know right? But it's the offseason and we learned that he has a "staff" and Skid is on it! LOL

Yep I never had that much of a problem with Romo's picks and fumbles - all quarterbacks have their share of those. It was ever and always the TIMING of a good number of them, that I had the problem with and it became a pattern. It's not like Romo was ever threatening Brett Favre's pick and...

Had I asked my question on the open board over there, y'all might have gotten mad and might also have valid reason to be, and probably banned me. I asked in PRIVATE, as a friend, trying as always to be helpful. It's nothing to get bent out of shape about.

I was asking, not telling. But that's completely aside from what you quoted there. You come on here bellyaching about the content of a private message that was never sent to you, it's up to other people to decide if it was shared, or read.

Well, you're wrong. I was merely trying to be helpful, as I always have.

Yep after you were caught, you bragged.

So Skid thinks it was condescending? My goodness there's some snowflakes in the world.

And, using the PM system here to recruit - to poach - new people who come here, to the DCC. And thinks people wouldn't report that.

Whom I always thought was the actual owner of the site. And whom I have swapped messages with off and on for two years, with no issues. Now at least I know what generated the questions about whether DCU needed any donations or not - the two boards share a good number of members, all reading...

It was not sent to you. If the recipient thought it was condescending why didn't he reply with such? You posting a small snippet of it out of context to make it look like what you accuse? Typical dick sucker move. You're here throwing a fit about a PM that wasn't even yours?