Search results

He didn't lie. He said he couldn't say. I have forbidden anyone from saying.

Correct! Fixed your post.

It's good to see you have faith. Bitterly cling to it brotha.

SF at 16-1.

I think the 20-1 if it's actually a true line, is a sucker bet to reel dumbass Cowboys fans in. There can't actually be anyone setting these odds who actually thinks Dallas has a team that's worth a shit, can there?

I can place bets with CBS?

LOL

Source?

"Dak Attack" at this point looks like fantasy, and "The book of Ezekiel" is a false religion. It's clear the hype for these two is in full swing for a lot of goofy cultists and idiot sports writers, talking heads and pundits. When in reality, neither of them has really done jack shit yet.

He just announced it on NFL Live.

Then, you're simply stupid. When you state something as fact, it is entirely up to YOU to back that up with something proving it. It's NOT up to anyone else to "prove me wrong." That's a classic deflection fallacy. Nobody's arguing THAT and it is NOT what you fucking SAID. You are GOING TO BE...

Someone said, "George Bush said the sky was green." Then somebody said, "Show me where he ever said that." Then the dude replied with links showing where Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, twelve hack writers and Barack Obama said that. Then we were like, "Fucking show me where GEORGE BUSH said that!"...

You sumbitches ain't funny.

That kind of stuff is actually points in their favor, for social justice Jerral.

Yeah I'm just, sticking to exactly what he said. Was hoping that keeping it as simple as possible would help. He's already shown his ability to move the goalposts, deflect and obscure without any help.

You need to READ what you said, and either admit it's just supposition on your part or give us a credible source for it. This ain't it. You continue to deflect and pettifog. It does not make one fuck if other people have said Dak was a first round talent. Nobody's arguing that! YOU said...

Still no source for your original claim you now seem to be ignoring. If it is just supposition by you, why don't you just say so? There's NO WHERE you've pointed that has what you said. You're right it does discredit, and even without the "big fonts." I gave you the "big fonts" moron, because...

Still nothing that backs what you asserted. Once again, it's: And nothing else. You can't dazzle with brilliance, so you're trying to baffle with bullshit. Moving the goal posts and muddying the waters. Pettifogging.

Nobody's ever claimed otherwise. You're arguing against a point that was never made by anyone here. Yes, and you should try it once in awhile.

I can see now you're either intentionally obtuse, or are just moving the goal posts to suit you. THIS is what's being challenged, not anything else you posted: You have given nothing at all to back this assertion. And nobody's argued any other point. Show us a credible source for the...