They ought to claim him just to stick it to the SJWs. It's not like he'd be under contract, they're only claiming the rights not signing them for money.
Reminds me of the Baltimore RB, can't remember his name. Ray Rice or something? Everything was kept under the rug until the mean ole video came out. Looks like exactly the same shit here.
Putrid: 18 for 28, 127 yds and a pick
Not putrid: 24 for 28, 248 yds and 1 TD, no picks.
Not with the coaching he is getting.
You don't know at all what he is "content" with.
No, it's not. Neutral zone infractions happen all the time and get called, all the time.
The penalty on Butler gets called too, just a lot more rarely because it so rarely ever happens. That fact doesn't change the legitimacy or accuracy of the foul.
It makes exactly zero fucks where his hand is. His HEAD is clearly violating the neutral zone and he is offsides. The call is correct. Ticky-tacky? Debatable. The violation existed and was called correctly and is NOT debatable.
He is lined up offsides because he is a dumb dullard doper who...
What we saw tonight was a DEVIATION from DESPERATION. We knew we wouldn't be winning a shootout, weren't going to hang a fortyburger on them so we DESPERATELY went to what Marinelli and other way over-conservative defensive coordinators call a "kamikaze approach." Which is Jimmy Johnson's core...
We displayed the template for stopping these high powered offenses. It's the same way we snuffed out the "K-Gun" offense of Buffalo in the 90s nobody else could stop. By taking chapters out of Jimmy Johnson's book.
Rest of the league will follow, while we go back to "read and react, bend but...
He's right but he doesn't know it. The team won't be the same one we saw tonight, ever again. Because we'll throw away tonight's defensive game plan and never revisit it. It was a one time thing specifically for Nawlins.
Accurate descriptions can be hilarious. That doesn't speak at all to the accuracy. If you're getting called a troll a lot, you're a troll.
And, you are. Everything's gotta be about YOU.
90S LBs were all about pursuit and ending plays with sure tackling. However I think our current LB personnel are simply better at it than our 90s ones were.
Yeah, you're not participating in the thread, you're making off topic posts about YOU while adults are talking FOOTBALL.
Fucking idiot. It's not about YOU.
Nobody's reading your walls of text, hence why we may have missed your. Alleged mea culpa.
When you cloud it with a wall of shit, that happens.
Brevity, dumbass. Keep it simple stupid.
Turnovers on defense come naturally to the attack posture. Players not used to seeing the ball out react slow to it. We're not used to seeing the ball available because we haven't been an attack defense like we were tonight.
If you're always in attack posture you get used to ball availability...
Clearly we had a plan tonight and it worked. It was tailored to what our personnel can do, not what their personnel has done. It's a distinction. We approached this game differently than any other game in the last ten years at least. This was Jimmy's 90s Cowboy D out there tonight. Upfield...
He is offsides. Because he is a stupid dope smoking dumbass. That's all there is to this. Same exact reasons he crashed into their punter. Because he is a stupid dope smoking dumbass.
That's all you've ever done. You can't dazzle with brilliance so you try to baffle with bullshit, posting tons of mindless word salad for the reader to have to wade through to find your main imbecile point you're trying to make.
Stop mucking up threads with your stupid shit. Make your points...
They didn't do the physical why? Because "Pay the man." They didn't see the red flags on Dez why? Because "Pay the man."
It's an infantile idiot mentality, not a business approach. They all are fucking PAID for everything they do. We don't owe them extra money just because they performed well...