Search results

Bailey hooks yet another one for the Vikes... Way wide left with no chance on distance either. Missed 2 last week as well. Looks like we made a good move cutting him.

Oh dbair you gotta be hating that, they've hidden all their hands!

Because: Garrett regime: " My God, Fred is great. I don't know WHAT we would do if he went down!" Jimmy regime: "If we lose Step we'll be prepared because our backup is ready in all phases and nuances of his position. We've put in the WORK and assured that. At all positions." HOPE is a plan...

Make sure you don't ever run any of the maintenance tools on that SSD, like defragment for example. Not only is it never necessary, it can fuck up your data. Also beware of your power situation, don't just leave the sumbitch on all the time. SSDs don't react well to outages, spikes...

Amazing how the more transistors we're able to embed into each square inch of silicon, the more the technological curve of computing power steepens. And that rate, the increase in the number of transistors per square inch? That curve is exponential now. Kurtzweil's Law of Accelerating Returns is...

Only third person ballot I ever saw that had a significant effect on the outcome of a Presidential election.

The point is exactly what I said. Today's mobile young QBs never had the pocket training the old timers you list did. Never had it in HS, or college but now must learn it in the pros. Those guys knew how to take a snap from center and properly do 5 and 7 step dropbacks. Knew how to read...

Yep it's the conference of the soft zone backend and the read and react front. And the "Air Raid" offense won't survive in the NFL any more than the "Run and Shoot" or the "K-Gun did.

And by the way, just to make sure I'm on record and you don't get it twisted, I am AGAINST extending Dak. I think they should let him play out his last year then let him test the market. If he gets signed away, more power to him. If not then we have all good reason to sign him to a short term...

Ahh, you mean after the first full offseason of Garrett's "coaching." See? You can actually get it, if you try. It's nice to see you're slowly starting to come around and no longer call Dak's 2016 campaign "just lucky." But, had most people here calling me an idiot, and such. NOBODY else saw it...

So... It took this league which has seen this before with Kaep and Vick.... 24 games to "figure Dak out" and you like to pretend they never tried the "make him beat us" stuff all through those first 24 games. And have erased from your memory how I PREDICTED the way Ginger's "coaching" was going...

You may have noticed a PayPal donation link on the main site page. Yes it is legitimate and yes it is intentional. Our new owner asks for donations to offset investment, upgrade and operational costs. Donating is entirely voluntary. Please give freely. He plans to upgrade us from this older...

DING! wITH the guy who was almost universally written off as a "scrub." COACHING FUCKING MATTERS.

It's PC in general that's eventually going to destroy the Republic, starting with free speech. "me too" is just one of the many heads of the PC Hydra. The problem with "bullying" laws and "hate crimes" laws is, they get to change the definitions of these according to who's in power and what...

Good point though. You might have something there. Getting on the exempt list might pre-empt restraining orders? As in, they might not go to court after the fact? I think they still could and could get that lifted, unless it's clearly spelled out that it's not subject to appeal via the CBA?

Not to mention backup QBs who started in and won Super Bowls. The Giants had one... Technically the Patriots had one... The Colts had one... But Dodger doesn't realize his quandry. He's either got to finally honor Ginger for his CoTY honors for his brilliant performance in 2016 getting to 13-3...

Because it's almost like, we never cut Zeke? It's irrevelant anyway and acedemic.

I seem to remember he won some court orders stopping the league from doing anything to him for specified times. Naturally this would include placing him exempt.

I understand the position of the ball in the picture and the neutral zone it represents, and the position of the idiot's hat in relation to it. His hand on the ground is completely irrelevant. His head IS violating the NZ. We agree on the LT. I said he was legal but close. You said he was...

If you can't look at the position of the ball in the picture, then look at the doper's head and see it intersects, then I have no help for you. Look at our other d-linemen who are not offsides, for reference. They are lined up correctly. The position of the doper's hand isn't at all relevant...