Search results

Like I was sayin earlier, none of the suing parties is stupid or foolish or inexperienced. Which leaves their true intent in question.

The swamp stupid to turn on the guy who threatens it? Your comparison is onerous - Bernie is part and parcel of the swamp. Trump threatens the swamp. If he creates his own new political party it's akin to what Perot did. Just splits the Republican vote. The swamp republicans WILL run a swamp...

Which, think about it. We're not dealing with idiots here. From Sidney Powell to Ken Paxton, these are LAWYERS. They're not stupid. So how come each and every suit they file is so silly and on its face has no standing? They have to have known that! Dovetails into what I've thought all along -...

Yeah I saw that a month or so ago, I lol'd it. Everything he's done since the debate, for whatever reason or another, helps the dems!

Plus, Texas wasn't arguing that other states violated federal law, the argument was they violated their own state laws. Section 2 of article 3 is quite clear on this point - the court by definition has no jurisdiction over state law. The actual jurisdiction is clearly defined in the text...

That might have been a cool argument and all, had it been included in the suit. Which didn't allege any type of fraud in any way, or that any Texas voters were injured parties. Article 3, section2, clause 1 is where the pothole was and what the basis for the dismissal came from.

I don't think it's hypocrisy or pussyfied at all to still eat meat but choose not to kill. Same with refusing to criticize hunters. It's their bag and we're not the nature police. We simply mind our own business. Every predator on this planet hunts and kills. But we as humans can individually...

Were these rats witnesses and whistleblowers as credible as all the ones put forth by Infowars on the 9/11 troofer shit, or the diebold shit? Please.

The courts followed the law. The Texas lawsuit is a great example. If you can't show damages then you have no standing. There were rats? Where'd they go?

This alone should give reasonable people pause for thought. A "vast left wing conspiracy" of 100s of thousands, without even ONE rat or whistleblower or even a hint of one. SO fucking efficient and efficacious!

And that's the actual intention. It's what they want.

Because Scot, for Trump this was never about any actual mass fraud, never about any actual evidence and never about keeping his seat. It is, was and was always about, de-legimitizing the opponent and the system. Getting back at them for being such meanies to him, trying to pay them back for what...

I spent about eight years as a young boy, on a little farm my stepdad bought/built. (It was just land with a house when we moved in.) We had everything from chickens, turkeys, cows, horses, hogs, even a couple of peacocks because my mom liked them. Massive garden where we raised ALL of our...

Drastically overhyped. Haven't really done shit since their one SB. Except for, keeping Jerruh paranoid about letting "the next Sean Payton" ever leave Dallas. Love Brees though. If Romo had 1 percent of the hatred of losing Brees has he woulda won a coupla Lombardis.

By the way you can see how much Brees hates to lose, in his eyes. I bet losses haunt him. This one sure should. Offense builds hype, drives ratings and swag sales and puts butts in seats. Fucken Defense puts trophies in trophy cases bitches.

I'M the fucken King of the Meme I make my own!

Yeah it's just a covid precaution, he's an elderly cardiac patient.

Bills fans, probably the most classy fans there are. Bless 'em. https://www.profootballforums.com/threads/bills-fans-flood-lamar-jacksons-charity-with-donations.59256/

Held a divisional opponent to three points. That's above, above average. The quickness, youth, speed and scheme of their D brings back fond memories of the early 90s Dallas D. Baltimore's mistake though was going away from their running game and trying to throw with a QB that just ain't a...

What'd I say.