Search results

Hilarious thing is, the dude has been here since 2017!

Jimmy's

Yep this is all clarified in the second edition of his book.

He ran like a little weenie didn't he? Few things in this world are more impotent than a "badass" who needs your cooperation in order to kick your ass - in this case he needed his opponent to tell him where to go to find him. A true Badass wouldn't need that. Classic Internet Tuffguy and it's...

They have their buzzphrase, "root cause." The fucking "root cause" is socialism and despotism.

Today at the liquor store drive-thru around 4pm, I paid for my stuff then gave the manager a hunnerd dolla bill and said, "Pay for the folks behind me, for however long it lasts." And drove off. Only just now saw this thread and it made me Ell Ohh Ell.

But seriously, you got the "wow" for the picture in my mind of a bunch of bears spraying each other with cans of bear spray.

Beside that, I've been watching Johnny Carson every weeknight for about the last month. You have some really stiff competition in the humor department.

I totally understood that, and it earned you a "wow." I was then addressing the rest of your post.

It being made illegal to use on humans for self defense or any reason. Like how they did pepper spray. Dude does a home invasion, you end it with pepper spray, you wind up in jail same as the perps.

He's gotta have huge tax write-offs. One of the burdens of the billionaire.

It's only a joke until it happens. Think about it.

If we don't like your opinion we are going to reply and say so. If you don't like that just hit logout.

All depends on the definition of "success."

Nobody's proposing that. There's nothing in what I've said that even suggests that. I'm saying that any arrest for FiP gets presented to the AUSA of that district. I want to change the federal FiP law by giving it a lot more teeth. No bargaining with it, no reduced sentence or dropped charge for...

And that's what I'm saying needs changed, for felon in possession. If they "go to state," federal laws don't apply and aren't used. States can't prosecute federal statutes. If the state charges you with felon in possession they prosecute you using their statute. This does not stop the AUSA...

If it's charged under federal statutes it's adjudicated in federal court. Doesn't matter who does the arrest. The AUSA for that district decides yea or nay. MY idea is, if it's felon in possession it HAS to be federal and you're lookin at 20 years in federal pen.

What you're REALLY trying to say is "you don't need a gun" and that's irrelevant. We have a RIGHT to keep and bear arms. There's no qualifiers in that. Whether you "need" a firearm or not is a silly childish argument. To keep and bear arms is a fucking RIGHT guaranteed in the Constitution...

Actually that's only half right. At the end of games they would linger, practicing "complementary football" patting opponents on the butt swapping jerseys and complementing them on how they kicked our ass.

If gun was illegal the criminal would still have one. IS the point.