Search results

You could be right Mav. But we did hold them to 20 and while the D didn't play great, they held them to 7 points in the second half. The problem is, they held our offense to 3 points int he second half. You have to muster more than 3 points a half when you have some premier players on offense.

The afternoon game was actually up 2 points from last year (or something like that). I figured it would be the other way around since the Cowboys are such a big draw but I guess people wanted to see Tom Brady....

And this was for the Cowboys...... NBC’s Sunday Night Football Ratings Crash Nearly 30% for Woke Opening Weekend https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2020/09/14/nbcs-sunday-night-football-ratings-crash-nearly-30-for-woke-opening-weekend/

I think you'll find that a lot of the younger fans inherited their parent's passion for the team, especially if those young fans live outside of Texas. I can say that's the case for my son. I would also say the older generation is more loyal in the sense that we grew up with these players...

Yeah, the D wasn't good but it did hold the Rams to 20 points. When your offense is 1 for 7 on 3rd down, your offense has some issues. If we keep teams to 20 points and under, you should win a lot of games if you have a franchise QB, especially when you have a premier RB and WR(s).

LOL trying to put out the fire with a shield......

One thing is clear. We kept the OC and much of the same offense because of Dak. Had MM changed to a West Coast Offense, I'm not sure the team and Dak could have mastered the offense in the off-season. Next year MM will switch over to a WCO. If the guy is going to lose, he's going to lose...

Are you talking to me or Babe?

In other words, we need to surround him with talent at every position and spend a first round pick on a position that we spent another 1st round pick to acquire........

You can't change the definition to suit your interpretation and to fit your narrow minded argument. It doesn't work that way. It's like I'm debating with a child....and with the way the current libs think, I probably am. Do me a favor and go argue with Internetking. You guys speak the same...

So a bill was torpedoed by Southern Dems and you still find a way to blame a Republican. Do you even listen to yourself?

I'm not making any claim. You are and can't provide anything to back up your claims. What does Federal law enforcement have anything to do with State laws? The bigger the lie, the more the people will believe it.

Can you tell me who made this claim? No, you can't.

You only listen to people who agree with your agenda. This President has been an ally of the military and his support of the military shouldn't really be an issue with anyone that has half a brain. But folks need to promote these unsubstantiated claims to try and take military votes in an...

Yes, I'm sure the Dems slashing the defense budget is great for the military. Real pro-military...those Dems. Some people believe what they hear and nothing of what they see. This is more proof that you're just a shill and a mindless drone who is told what to think without seeing the...

You made the claim, not me, so I don't need to start anywhere. I posted links against your argument. So far, you've just posted nothing but drivel and think people are just going to take your word for it. Jim Crow were state laws passed by Southern Democrats. Do you deny that?

Did this idiot just say "second" chance? :roflolrhard:

I was around then buddy and it was pretty unceremonious. And I recall you had a ton of posts and were one of the more active posters. But anyone could see you and Woody's Girl was never going to work out. Whatever makes you feel better....

The guy has to take the rock in the redzone from a QB that no one fears on that part of the field. As much as I dislike Dak (as a QB), I'm willing to see if MM can do something with him.