Search results

I will be livid if we take Eifert. I will be okay with the Austin pick.

And who might you be?

You sonofabitch!

~starts to post pics of his dick, sees Sheik's post, posts pics of his dick anyway~ Fuck the police.

Oh lord, he is here, too? :awkward

Yes. He shouldn't have been, IMO. Me, personally, doesn't hold to the notion that years in the country allows you more freedoms. I hold to the feeling that if you drop a bomb you lose your freedoms even to the point of loss of due process. Those parameters just need to be clearly defined.

You so funny.

Gun Control - Con Legalized Marijuana - Pro Legalization of all drugs - Con Immigration reform - Pro Death penalty - Pro Abortion - Con Gay marriage - DGAS either way Education vouchers - Pro Education reform - Pro prostitution - Should be legal Euthanasia - Con (the idea of Euthanasia as it is...

Well, to actually list everything that I think would qualify could take a while. After all, there are a ton of ways that an individual could incite terror.

It is very early, but I couldn't resist taking the shot. BFFs still?

First sweep of the season for the Rangers... against... the Mariners. Just sayin'.

It would gain me an aneurysm.

I trade back and then take Reid if those are the only options given me.

See how I responded to the post I quoted. In my mind, once he committed that terrorist act he gave up his rights as an American citizen.

He gave that up when committed an act of war against the USA. He is now a terrorist.

To compare him to the likes of Bates or Gant is stupid. He is a good ST player that can't do shit else. It's a stupid signing.

It can stop when acts of war on our soil stop. That simple. Oh, and your analogy is still stupid. Threat = potential. Enemy = right fucking now.

A threat is a far cry from someone who just blew up an 8 year old kid watching his dad finish the Boston Marathon. It's a stupid analogy.

I don't think acts of war are given due process.

:towel