Search results

I think more extensive background checks will help, yes.

Yes.

N O

What the hell does what the gun lobby say have anything to do with how the votes fell? These congressmen don't read the fucking bill themselves? As much as I think this amendment to the bill should have passed, I think this is bullshit.

Sad damn day, really. I believe this is a bi-partisan thing that could help. Not a crazy nutjob initiative from either side. But, a real step forward in helping to prevent crazy shit like Newtown from happening again. Silly that this one couldn't pass. No reason for it not to.

You mean like 2002 and 2003? Or do you mean like using our first, second, and fourth picks on CBs in 2000?

oic Well, I would still go Werner, no matter what the hillbilly would most likely do, which as you stated, would probably be Vacarro.

WTF? You ask who we would pick and then change the direction of the thread to indicate we should have said who we thought the dumb shits will pick?

I go Werner.

:lol EDIT: :lol

I'm going to be on Capitol Hill tomorrow, so this is all a bit unnerving for me right now. Not that I suspect anything major to happen, but because if something were planned for DC tomorrow, the Hill would be in the list of juicy targets. WTF has happened to this planet?

I asked and they said they would try you as a child, since that's what I'm gonna beat you like.

Unacceptable. There should be no biased politics in teaching. Ever.

God damn, you are bored if you resort to bumping 2 year old Stallone threads.

Smitty still worships Parcells. His latest charge is Garrett, though. Stupid long threads with stupid long posts. Smitty is a smart guy, he just refuses to admit when he is wrong.

I'm fairly sure you and I had a couple dustups, but I can't say for sure since you really aren't all that important.

Cool, I still don't want him. It wouldn't be the first time someone sat in that room on opening night and didn't get picked in the first round.

If we lose our guns we will never get them back. It's a treacherous road to even start down by allowing them to take high capacity magazines. The road will not end there. If they are able to take that, they will move on to rifles, then to shotguns, then to pistols. No way they stop at just...

That's only the first step. That's only the first step. That's only the first step. That's only the first step.

Yeah, banning guns is the answer. This is proof that the libs have no clue what they're talking about, and would only further put as at danger under the guise of trying to protect us.