But then when the results match what they said, it does have meaning.
They were making a point of it and going out of their way to say it.
They had NO intention of spending a draft pick on a RB.
No it doesn't, it just fits what you believe so now you value what they say. Surely you didn't think the Cowboys were gonna win the Super Bowl every time jerri started spouted off in preseason of years past?
You've constructed a scenario where the only way they could show they valued the running back is to have drafted, signed a free agent or traded for one even though events might have taken place that prevented it from occurring at the right price for the right player.
* They
might have wanted to sign Murray back until Philly overpaid (there is a cap and it does matter). Had they signed him at all costs and he shit the bed like he has in Philly, I suspect you and everyone else (me included) would be going ballistic over overpaying him.
* They
might have wanted to draft one in the 2nd round but then Gregory fell (if their board is good, should they ignore it and draft a lower ranked RB or take a player of need that is ranked much higher than any available RB?)
* They
might have wanted a specific back in the 3rd round but
maybe all the backs they valued were gone by the time their pick came up (Duke Johnson, Tevin Coleman & David Johnson were all drafted before our pick in the 3rd round......they could have drafted Matt Jones or Jeremy Langford though)
So all I've done is speculate as well. No one here knows what goes on behind closed doors at the ranch, we're all stuck trying to read between the lines and guess.
It may be like you say, it might not, there's no way for us to know with certainty unless we had a mole in the building or someone came out and starting talking.
I'd love to have a candid conversation with Callahan, seems like he has a bone to pick with the Cowboys and would enlighten folks on some of the BS that takes place with the Cowboys and I do think there is some fucked up reasoning and decision making going on and always will be as long as jerri is large and "in charge".
I'm not saying you're wrong with your conclusions, I'm just not buying your certainty or your reasoning. I know nothing I just said will change your opinion, nor is that my goal, I'm just spit-balling to offer a different possibility while trying to glean the truth from what little info we have.