LAZARUS_LOGAN
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,639
- Reaction score
- 207
Yes
Perhaps then you should take into account that his numbers in his first 50 games is 3rd all time among WRs, behind Jerry Rice and Rnady Moss. Since you want to play the stat game.
Yes
Good. Let's hope for another season like last. Maybe, just maybe then Garrett will be shown the door.
Perhaps then you should take into account that his numbers in his first 50 games is 3rd all time among WRs, behind Jerry Rice and Rnady Moss. Since you want to play the stat game.
A good shut-down corner can improve the pass rush. "Coverage sacks."
The division winning Redskins got better today.
Sure, the price they paid was high, and in a few years they may regret it, but as a football team, their roster got significantly better.
We did not get better this off-season. Once again, our top strategy is "hope." We have to hope Romo can be healthy....hope Dez is healthy....and hope we nail the draft, despite any evidence that we have the ability to actually do that.
The Giants got better this off-season as well and they also finished ahead of us.
The Eagles took a big step towards rebuilding.
We stood pat for the most part.
Please. Like Garrett would be anything but the catcher in that situation.
hopefully he turns into another Nnamdi Asomugha
I don't think that will happen, but I think not having the Carolina scheme will make him mortal. He was a perfect fit there.
Why couldn't it? Asomooga was more highly regarded than Norman then too.
We shall see how the rest of his career pans out and compares to the greats over time
Remember that he will be loosing Romo to throw to him in a year or two and will be delegated to QB hell for at least a decade. So his production is likely to take a very steep drop off once Romo is gone
Sure we will. But that is irrelevant to the discussion at this moment.
I think you mean relegated. And where do you get a decade? Seriously?
Sure we will. But that is irrelevant to the discussion at this moment.
I think you mean relegated. And where do you get a decade? Seriously?
You are correct, I meant regulated. Siri got ahold of that one.
As for the decade I speak of that we will have to suffer thru with shitty WB play I was actually being generous. Look how long we went without a decent QB after Aikman. We will go thru a long search for Romo's replacement when he gets knocked out of the game for good this season or next. History tells us that much and Jerry's lack of urgency in finding the aging and often injured Romo's replacement proves it
You cannot go by history. Show us a time in history that the Cowboys had an UFDA of Romo's caliber? Also... that was a younger Jerry as oppose to an older one, that has ceded much control to Stephen.
Wtf do you mean you can't go by history? That is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard!
History shows us patterns, namely patterns of behavior to be exact.
So we're going to have another Romo then? Another UFDA QB that is going to come in and do like Romo, right? Because we're talking about history. And f that's the vase, as I asked you... where and who was the UFDA QB for the Cowboys before Romo, that had the same amount of success?
No need to draft a QB. Just wait 10 years and go after a UFDA QB. History suggests as much? That should be our draft strategy.
That's idiotic.
Thank you for making my point for me
The way that Jerry and company go about securing a Franchise QB is idiotic. You are correct! I'm not saying that is what we should do or that it's the correct thing to do. Quite the opposite!
I'm not saying history will mean that we find another Romo. What I'm talking about is Jerry's past behavior is a predictor of his future behavior. And that should scare the shit out of every Cowboy fan especially when it comes to how they go about securing a franchise QB. Jerry got lucky with Romo.