Who's going to be our #3 receiver

Who's going to be our #3 receiver


  • Total voters
    18
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
Who's going to be our #3 receiver?

Or, if you believe they will rotate, just vote what receiver you think will be the third leading WR in receptions by year end?
 
Messages
6,827
Reaction score
1
I don't think we will go into the season with one of those JAGS as the #3. We will sign a veteran JAG.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Dwayne Harris '12

The 3rd wide reciever we need!
 
Last edited:

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.

9.4 mil for Robinson?

4f35923e34365_bitch-please.png
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
I'm not saying Harris is who I think will be our #3, but he is who I am hoping has developed and can further develop into our #3.
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.

It's puff puff pass, not puff puff puff puff puff puff puff. Light a new one. puff puff puff puff puff
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
Yeah, I must be high or something to think it'd be worth paying an extra million for a guy that produced for us last year, instead of paying 1 million less for an underachieving bum just because he was a first round pick at one time.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
Yeah, I must be high or something to think it'd be worth paying an extra million for a guy that produced for us last year, instead of paying 1 million less for an underachieving bum just because he was a first round pick at one time.

so in your scenario we've paid Robinson. Awesome.

Who is our SOLB now?
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
I would argue that 50-60 points per year is far more than Spencer can offer.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
And there were a few options early in free agency. Kam Wimbley and some other guy.

Meh options. Pretty much Spencer-like players, but cheaper.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
I would argue that 50-60 points per year is far more than Spencer can offer.

So your idea is that Robinson is a perennial 10 TD per year guy? i dont think so, homey. outliers should never be treated as the norm, Peerless Price.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
And there were a few options early in free agency. Kam Wimbley and some other guy.

Meh options. Pretty much Spencer-like players, but cheaper.

So in your alternative we have spent 9.4 mil on Robinson to watch Romo run around while Robinson stands in place and waits for the ball - and we've also given someone who is the same or worse than Spencer a multi-year deal?

Maybe you didn't think this the whole way through.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
We'll never know what he could do as Romo's security binky. All I have to go off of is last year. Very convenient for my argument, I admit.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
15
So in your alternative we have spent 9.4 mil on Robinson to watch Romo run around while Robinson stands in place and waits for the ball - and we've also given someone who is the same or worse than Spencer a multi-year deal?

Maybe you didn't think this the whole way through.

I think my scenario makes us a better football team. Ill take points over giving up 100 less rushing yards a year.
 
Top Bottom