Who's going to be our #3 receiver

Who's going to be our #3 receiver


  • Total voters
    18
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Who's going to be our #3 receiver?

Or, if you believe they will rotate, just vote what receiver you think will be the third leading WR in receptions by year end?
 
Messages
6,827
Reaction score
1
I don't think we will go into the season with one of those JAGS as the #3. We will sign a veteran JAG.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Dwayne Harris '12

The 3rd wide reciever we need!
 
Last edited:

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.

9.4 mil for Robinson?

4f35923e34365_bitch-please.png
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
I'm not saying Harris is who I think will be our #3, but he is who I am hoping has developed and can further develop into our #3.
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
Too bad the franchise tag wasn't placed on a player that could have been worth it(Robinson), that would have been nice.

It's puff puff pass, not puff puff puff puff puff puff puff. Light a new one. puff puff puff puff puff
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
Yeah, I must be high or something to think it'd be worth paying an extra million for a guy that produced for us last year, instead of paying 1 million less for an underachieving bum just because he was a first round pick at one time.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Yeah, I must be high or something to think it'd be worth paying an extra million for a guy that produced for us last year, instead of paying 1 million less for an underachieving bum just because he was a first round pick at one time.

so in your scenario we've paid Robinson. Awesome.

Who is our SOLB now?
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
I would argue that 50-60 points per year is far more than Spencer can offer.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
And there were a few options early in free agency. Kam Wimbley and some other guy.

Meh options. Pretty much Spencer-like players, but cheaper.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I would argue that 50-60 points per year is far more than Spencer can offer.

So your idea is that Robinson is a perennial 10 TD per year guy? i dont think so, homey. outliers should never be treated as the norm, Peerless Price.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
And there were a few options early in free agency. Kam Wimbley and some other guy.

Meh options. Pretty much Spencer-like players, but cheaper.

So in your alternative we have spent 9.4 mil on Robinson to watch Romo run around while Robinson stands in place and waits for the ball - and we've also given someone who is the same or worse than Spencer a multi-year deal?

Maybe you didn't think this the whole way through.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
We'll never know what he could do as Romo's security binky. All I have to go off of is last year. Very convenient for my argument, I admit.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
So in your alternative we have spent 9.4 mil on Robinson to watch Romo run around while Robinson stands in place and waits for the ball - and we've also given someone who is the same or worse than Spencer a multi-year deal?

Maybe you didn't think this the whole way through.

I think my scenario makes us a better football team. Ill take points over giving up 100 less rushing yards a year.
 
Top Bottom