dbair1967 Administrator Messages 65,983 Reaction score 15,261 Oct 19, 2012 #2 I dont know what the numbers are on a year to year basis, but 45% seems really good. Still wish we'd do something to get turnovers and more pressure on the QB though.
I dont know what the numbers are on a year to year basis, but 45% seems really good. Still wish we'd do something to get turnovers and more pressure on the QB though.
bkeavs UDFA Messages 2,189 Reaction score 0 Oct 19, 2012 #3 dbair1967 said: I dont know what the numbers are on a year to year basis, but 45% seems really good. Still wish we'd do something to get turnovers and more pressure on the QB though. Keep reading... Draft and sign more DB's Last edited: Oct 19, 2012
dbair1967 said: I dont know what the numbers are on a year to year basis, but 45% seems really good. Still wish we'd do something to get turnovers and more pressure on the QB though. Keep reading... Draft and sign more DB's
Theebs Quality Starter Messages 8,534 Reaction score 0 Oct 19, 2012 #4 its a %. we had a bye and the ravens had 4 2nd half posessions. check our defense after ny, atl and philly get done with it.
its a %. we had a bye and the ravens had 4 2nd half posessions. check our defense after ny, atl and philly get done with it.
peplaw06 2 Messages 8,660 Reaction score 1 Oct 19, 2012 #5 The bye doesn't affect percentages... except that we have a smaller sample size.
GloryDaysRBack Quality Starter Messages 5,080 Reaction score 1 Oct 19, 2012 #7 Lolol. Take Theebs advice. Check back later
S superpunk Pro Bowler Messages 11,003 Reaction score 1 Oct 19, 2012 #8 I was surprised as anyone when I saw that last night.