Patton was right all along.Yeah it's all the same war. WW2 ended in name only, everything that happened after the treaties is just the proxy nature of war in the nuclear age. Korea, Vietnam, the cold war... the islamists who were in the wrong side of history... communists teaming up with them to invade free countries with immigration armies... The losers didn't want to accept it and didn't.
Melania says he sleeps no more than 2-3 hours a day.lolol...I predict this will be turned into an SNL skit, you heard it here first
say what you want about this guy but his energy is off the charts, I'm 20 years younger than him and couldnt keep his schedule (nor want to)
Fox News host Mark Levin argues the framers of the 14th Amendment did not intend to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.’
The tax system and income tax in general sucks, but I gotta say this yr whatever they changed from last yr helped me immensely. I normally pay a little or basically break even. This yr I got the largest return (mostly federal) that I have ever received and many people I know have commented similarly.
Of course my first call after confirming the numbers were correct were to my company's payroll people, and changed some of my tax withholding stuff to account for this next yr. But this year I definitely made out.
Fox News host Mark Levin argues the framers of the 14th Amendment did not intend to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.’
plus an exclusion for babies born here (especially Chinese) but never reside in the US, its absurd they can travel to the US, have a baby, get US citizenship for that child and go back to China and use it for gawd knows want intended purpose in the futureThis is when Mark Levin is at his best. He is absolutely right on all his points. Ann Coulter does a good job of obliterating the arguments for birthright citizenship as well. Birthright citizenship was a manufactured social policy by some unelected judges who used attitudes rather than law to justify it.
But, this case is not going to be decided by law, no matter how right Mark or anyone else is. This decision will be made by social expediency. We have millions of anchor babies in this country, many are adults of all ages. They have been exercising their rights as citizens for years. No court, and especially not the Roberts court, is going to strip these people of their citizenship. They are going to throw the whole thing to congress to solve. We need a law that exempts current anchor babies while not conveying citizenship on future anchor babies. This problem was made by some rogue courts and now must be solved by our feckless congress.