This is just another travesty of justice from the "we love Democracy" Democrats. First, no lawsuit should be heard unless the plaintiff can provide specifics. In this case, Carroll could not provide a time and date when this alleged rape occurred. How can a defendant properly defend himself in a case like this? Carroll had no witnesses, which again is absurd. In a luxury high end store like BG a salesperson would attach himself/herself to a man like Trump and provide every bit of assistant he needed to shop. There is no chance they would let Donald Trump, one of the richest men in NY at the time, walk around fending for himself. But Carroll could not provide a single employee of BG that remembers the day Donald Trump walked into their store. It is unbelievable to me that a judge let this case go forward, but more unbelievable that a jury found him liable, even with the lower standard for civil suits.
This particular aspect of the case is for slander when Trump called he a liar and crazy. Given he is party to a civil suit brought by her, his comments should be protected by the first amendment. Further, he may be right. After all, she complained that 7 other men also raped her going back to her college days.
I don't think the SC is going to hear this case, honestly. But Carroll, who was back financially by prominent Democrat cannot be allowed to get away with this travesty.
