Trump Second Term Tracker

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
66,782
Reaction score
15,889
I have no idea what we do about Ketanji Brown-Jackson but my goodness she is an imbecile. Her she is arguing why a president cannot fire agency heads who work for agencies that report to the president. Just think about that for a second. A president cannot choose his advisors because Justice Jackson may disagree with the president's position on certain subjects. This TDS suffering dumbass doesn't even pretend to understand the law or the constitution. She just wings it based on her feelings. Imagine if Democrats expend the court to 13 and add four more dumbasses like Jackson to the Supreme Court. We will have a mess for a country and the constitution and rule of law will be a thing of a by-gone era.


They absolutely should pursue removing her from the bench.

She never belonged there in the first place and it seems like they may have some legal justification for removing her (or at least forcing a reconfirmation, which obviously she would never get) because of the Biden autopen fiasco.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
3,369
They absolutely should pursue removing her from the bench.

She never belonged there in the first place and it seems like they may have some legal justification for removing her (or at least forcing a reconfirmation, which obviously she would never get) because of the Biden autopen fiasco.
She will never be removed. It would take 67 votes in the Senate and there is no chance any Democrat would go along with removal. In fact, Democrats would like to ad at least 4 more justices just like her.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
66,782
Reaction score
15,889
, Democrats would like to ad at least 4 more justices just like her.
And they will if they take back the Senate. They'll remove the filibuster within 30 seconds of regaining power and PRESTO! We'll have two new libtard states, 4 more libtard senators and a completely packed SCOTUS.

We'd probably never have to worry about this is that fucking clown Thune would dump the filibuster now, because we could immediately pass all the voter integrity initiatives needed that will prevent Dems from winning the only way they know how.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
66,782
Reaction score
15,889
Why? Why do we suddenly give 2 turds about Venezuela? Why risk spilling 1 drop of American blood for that shit hole?
I wouldn't worry about any US military getting killed in this. They have about as close to zero military capability as you can have. Most of their stuff is severely antiquated or doesn't work at all.

There's also very few people actually loyal to Maduro there. My bet is most of their military would lay down their weapons as soon as any fighting started.

That said, it's unlikely that any troops would actually enter Venezuela, unless it's an elite special forces/SEAL group that goes into a building to kill Maduro where he sits.
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
7,406
Reaction score
6,762

Dec. 10 (UPI) — U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican serving a House district in Kentucky, introduced legislation for the United States to pull out of NATO.


Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, posted on X that she would be a co-sponsor of the Not a Trusted Organization Act, or NATO Act. Utah Republican Mike Lee introduced the same legislation in the Senate earlier this year.


“NATO is a Cold War relic,” Massie said in a statement Tuesday. “We should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our own country, not socialist countries.


“NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which collapsed over 30 years ago. Since then, U.S. participation has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and continues to risk U.S. involvement in foreign wars.”


He added: “Our Constitution did not authorize permanent foreign entanglements, something our Founding Fathers explicitly warned us against. America should not be the world’s security blanket – especially when wealthy countries refuse to pay for their own defense.”


NATO was founded in 1949 by 12 members as a military alliance involving European nations, as well as the U.S. and Canada in North America. There are now 32 members, with Finland joining in 2023 and Sweden in 2024.


The NATO Act would prevent the use of U.S. taxpayer funds for NATO’s common budgets, including its civil budget, military budget and the Security Investment Program.


Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty allows nations to opt out.
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
7,406
Reaction score
6,762

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
3,369

Dec. 10 (UPI) — U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican serving a House district in Kentucky, introduced legislation for the United States to pull out of NATO.


Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, posted on X that she would be a co-sponsor of the Not a Trusted Organization Act, or NATO Act. Utah Republican Mike Lee introduced the same legislation in the Senate earlier this year.


“NATO is a Cold War relic,” Massie said in a statement Tuesday. “We should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our own country, not socialist countries.


“NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which collapsed over 30 years ago. Since then, U.S. participation has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and continues to risk U.S. involvement in foreign wars.”


He added: “Our Constitution did not authorize permanent foreign entanglements, something our Founding Fathers explicitly warned us against. America should not be the world’s security blanket – especially when wealthy countries refuse to pay for their own defense.”


NATO was founded in 1949 by 12 members as a military alliance involving European nations, as well as the U.S. and Canada in North America. There are now 32 members, with Finland joining in 2023 and Sweden in 2024.


The NATO Act would prevent the use of U.S. taxpayer funds for NATO’s common budgets, including its civil budget, military budget and the Security Investment Program.


Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty allows nations to opt out.

Massie is right, but it is actually worse than that. NATO is a one way organization. If Europe got into a war of course the US would be there to do its duty as a NATO ally. But I don't think Europe would be there is the US got into a war. We already know from experience France and Germany would hesitate to get involved in US conflicts. I suspect, Britain is approaching that position as well.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
3,369
Democrats took advantage of the rare appearance by Noem on Capitol Hill to re-up allegations that Noem gave a $220 million contract to a firm tied to the spouse of DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin and argue that immigration enforcement officers have violated the civil rights and due process of unauthorized immigrants and U.S. citizens alike.

View attachment 21241
The problem is Democrats have been very successful at pushing these false narratives because they have the entire corporate media to carry their water for them.

They have to pretend ICE is doing terrible things so people do not stop to think about how reasonable it is to round up illegal alien criminals and deport them.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
26,023
Reaction score
9,365
Democrats took advantage of the rare appearance by Noem on Capitol Hill to re-up allegations that Noem gave a $220 million contract to a firm tied to the spouse of DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin and argue that immigration enforcement officers have violated the civil rights and due process of unauthorized immigrants and U.S. citizens alike.

View attachment 21241
 
Top Bottom