- Thread starter Woodson Bible & Guns
- Start date
NoMoRedJ
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 56
The tens of thousands of women marching in the anti-Trump Women’s March on Washington demonstration in Washington, D.C., Saturday are “mostly white” and experiencing “therapy” for their anxiety over Hillary Clinton’s election loss to Donald Trump in November, the Washington Post reports.
According to the Post:
Marchers — mostly women and mostly white — said they came to take the most public possible stand against Trump, a candidate and now president whom they said routinely insults women and the issues they care about. But the gathering also provided therapy for many, the balm of immersing themselves in a like-minded sea of citizens who had shared their anxiety and disappointment after Democrat Hillary Clinton’s historic bid for the presidency ended in defeat.
Anti-Trump Marchers ‘Mostly White’ Women Who Need ‘Therapy’ After Clinton Loss
According to the Post:
Marchers — mostly women and mostly white — said they came to take the most public possible stand against Trump, a candidate and now president whom they said routinely insults women and the issues they care about. But the gathering also provided therapy for many, the balm of immersing themselves in a like-minded sea of citizens who had shared their anxiety and disappointment after Democrat Hillary Clinton’s historic bid for the presidency ended in defeat.
Anti-Trump Marchers ‘Mostly White’ Women Who Need ‘Therapy’ After Clinton Loss
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
"The masses"? He lost the popular vote by millions last I checked and also had less votes than McCain and Romney.
He's the Jason Garrett of politicians. Orange and completely in over his head.
Fooled a bunch of idiots into believing he would get their outdated jobs back and he's already trying to put taxpayers on the hook for his useless wall.
He's gonna take care of his rich friends and leave all of his voters praying for crumbs. I'll enjoy my tax cuts but let's not pretend like he won anything.
He's already doing his best to replicate North Korean state news methods. Even Fox News--aka the mothership for dumbass baby boomers who need to die off already--has spoken against him at this point.
Was Hillary an answer? Hell no. Which ties back into the point that all these baby boomers need to go because shit that worked in 1960 doesn't really apply anymore.
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
Uh cuz he's making shit up as he goes. Ultimately, the dumbass democrats fucked this up but trump isn't some savior. Again, he's the jason garrett of politics and most certainly putin's little bitch just like Garrett with jerrah.
NoMoRedJ
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 56
I dont think Thomas Jefferson would be impressed with a butthurt Cavalier.
All the popular vote does is reveal how many fools we have concentrated in certain parts of the country, otherwise it's meaningless. Looking at the map, yea it was the masses.
- Messages
- 55,046
- Reaction score
- 6,165
That's a huge insult to Trump, I think some sort of forum discipline is due for you bucko
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 3,787
The only folks that could afford the disater that was Obama are the wealthy, the poor or the state/government workers (including teachers). The rich can afford it, the poor don't pay for it and the working class gets fucked again.
I don't know if Trump will bring jobs back. I don't know if he'll turn around the economy. But I do know where this country was headed with another 8 years of Democrats.
NoMoRedJ
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 56
With Trump there is at least a legitimate reason to hope for some improvement. With Hillary, or any DemoRat nothing but more decline in everything.
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
Not "butthurt" at all but great retort. And no, it still wasn't the "masses" despite your cute little map. Clinton got nearly 1 million more votes last I checked. That includes red areas. Trump got about the same number as Romney in his 2012 loss, meaning he wasn't quite as popular as you want him to be. The democrats went out of their way to nominate a bad candidate. That's pretty much all.
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,702
- Reaction score
- 6,001
The democrats went out of their way to nominate a bad candidate. That's pretty much all.
As did the Republicans. How bad did the Democratic nominee have to be to allow Trump to be elected over her?
Literally any other candidate besides Hillary would have destroyed Trump. The Democratic Party just nominated the only candidate out there that would force ppl to vote for Trump
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
Not many more people actually voted for Trump. That's why he lost by almost one million votes. The difference was that people didn't come out to vote for Hillary in the same way they did for Obama. That's on the democrats. It's also on the media for giving Trump hours and hours of free coverage as a ratings grab rather than seeking out candidates who actually had policies. Either way, he fooled at lot of people who he has absolutely no intention of doing anything for in the end. Like I said, he's jason garrett for the country. Great stuff.
English Cowboy
In the Rotation
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 300
Call me a Limey asshat who should mind his own business (and I'm sure you will). But how does Trump plan to "wipe ISIS from the face of the Earth"? Sure, you could drive them out of Iraq and Syria, but they'll just go to ground and resurface elsewhere. You can't destroy an ideology.
And how does he plan to bring jobs back to America from China and Mexico? Are there queues of Americans willing to work for less than the Chinese and Mexicans? I doubt it. Trump can put as many tariffs on imports as he wants, those jobs are gone and they're not coming back.
And as for Obamacare, trust me, there's nothing to fear. We have the NHS in Britain. Sure, it's not perfect, but it's always been there for me and my family when we've needed it. Everyone has access to an education, why not healthcare? It's the mark of a civilized society.
p.s. I am NOT a Communist.
And how does he plan to bring jobs back to America from China and Mexico? Are there queues of Americans willing to work for less than the Chinese and Mexicans? I doubt it. Trump can put as many tariffs on imports as he wants, those jobs are gone and they're not coming back.
And as for Obamacare, trust me, there's nothing to fear. We have the NHS in Britain. Sure, it's not perfect, but it's always been there for me and my family when we've needed it. Everyone has access to an education, why not healthcare? It's the mark of a civilized society.
p.s. I am NOT a Communist.
NoMoRedJ
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 56
Not "butthurt" at all but great retort. And no, it still wasn't the "masses" despite your cute little map. Clinton got nearly 1 million more votes last I checked. That includes red areas. Trump got about the same number as Romney in his 2012 loss, meaning he wasn't quite as popular as you want him to be. The democrats went out of their way to nominate a bad candidate. That's pretty much all.
Who else did the demorats have? Bernie? Who else? Bernie couldnt have won.
Out of the 16 candidates the Repubs had it was obvious early on that Trump was the only one that could beat Hillary. And Trump got better as the process went on.
You can deride him all you want but he's said the right things that nobody else was willing to say all along and he's putting together a great cabinet. And when it comes to the future and Supreme Court justices his picks will be huge for our future. Just those picks alone will make him a huge success most likely. Everything else will be a bonus.
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,702
- Reaction score
- 6,001
Nearly half the country voted for Trump. That would be nearly 63 million ppl. So saying not many ppl voted for him is complete BS.
Yes Clinton won the popular vote. But like Trump said if it was about the popular vote he would have spent a lot more time campaigning in CA and NY. CA alone accounts for her entire lead in the popular vote
As far as Trump getting elected that can be directly contributed to the liberal left media who never gave Trump a shot at winning and were calling the election a landslide victory for Clinton from the beginning. That alone gave all the snowflakes the feeling that the election was a foregone conclusion and that their vote wasn't needed for Hillary to win. So many of the libtards stayed home and did not vote
That is how Trump got elected!
Last edited:
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 3,787
Do you have to pay some exuberant monthly fee for health insurance and still have a deductible of thousands of dollars? The cost of goods in your country is outrageous and the tax rate is probably worse.
English Cowboy
In the Rotation
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 300
It's true that the cost of living has gone up more than wages since the crash in 2008, and people are struggling. I never said our system was perfect, or better. And I understand that the circumstances in our respective countries aren't entirely comparable. But the principle of affordable healthcare for all (free at the point of service in our case) is one I subscribe to. I pay in through tax and National Insurance, and I don't consider it extortionate. Like I say, there are times when I have needed the NHS, and I'm OK with contributing my fair share for when others need it (even though I know there are a few who pay in nothing, live like slobs, and abuse the system).
Maybe I'm a gullible sap, but I don't want to be one of those people saying ''I'm alright Jack'', pulling the ladder up, whilst giving a big FU to those less fortunate. Not very Christian is it?
Last edited:
junk
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,719
- Reaction score
- 0
I've seen people here, and other places, make comments about how terrible the last 8 years have been.
I'm curious what, in particular, has been so terrible? The stock market has seen record highs. The unemployment rate has pretty steadily decreased. Federal debt has soared, which is bad.
Please don't consider this as any sort of an endorsement for Obama.....I'm truly curious what people deem to be so terrible? Or what is so terrible now that was better in the previous administration?
I'm curious what, in particular, has been so terrible? The stock market has seen record highs. The unemployment rate has pretty steadily decreased. Federal debt has soared, which is bad.
Please don't consider this as any sort of an endorsement for Obama.....I'm truly curious what people deem to be so terrible? Or what is so terrible now that was better in the previous administration?