Dodger12
Super Moderator
- Messages
- 7,521
- Reaction score
- 4,557
There is ZERO positive reason to play Romo
The risk of injury is just too great. We need him healthy just in case something happens to Dak
And for those of you that STILL SAY he's NOT injury prone you are fucking idiots
He has literally broken three bones in the last five fucking plays
His broken bones are not fucking flukes! PERIOD
If he does well against a shitty Eagles team so what. He is supposed to. So it doesn't increase his trade value.
If he falters at all vs the Eagles he hurts his value
If he gets injured then no one will touch him and his career is over
This game is meaningless to us. Start Dak so he can beat Romo's record of 13 wins. Then play Sanchez
Once Dak gets his 14th win it will officially wipe the slate clean and once and for all for everyone to see wether they like it or not will have to accept that Dak in his first year was able to do what Romo never could in his ten years. Not only that he will do something that NO OTHER Cowboy QB has ever done and that includes Aikman
Romo is done, for good! Take your money and run while you still can
I would love nothing more than to see him go to the Broncos next season (who I hate), make it to the Super Bowl, have the Cowboys beat him in the SB and take away his one and only shot at "earning" a Super Bowl himself. Just like he has done with Cowboys for the last ten years
I would rather have a Romo not take a single snap all season. That way when he is presented his Super Bowl ring after we win the Super Bowl he will know that the only way he was ever able to ear a SB ring was by him NOT PLAYING
Another guy that wants to bag on the guy that carried this franchise and kept scrubs like Garrett employed. I just find this funny when guys say Romo sucks, he's done, he's fragile, Dak's the man, Dak's gonna do what Romo couldn't, etc. but then want to keep him around to save Dak's (and the team's) ass. If I'm Romo, I can't get out of Dallas soon enough.