dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 61,380
- Reaction score
- 11,283
Who's responsible for all this limiting?
Steven?
It's a mystery
Who's responsible for all this limiting?
Steven?
Who's responsible for all this limiting?
Steven?
I assume you mean Johnson in Dallas, so I will address it that way.
Jimmy was a defensive guru. That's not a label. His "upfield pressure" model revolutionized defense. "Read and react" is gone today, and most every team whether it be a 3-4 or a 4-3, whether it be college and even high school, runs the upfield pressure scheme today. As far as offenses go, he couldn't have cared less about it. Defense was his passion.
For his upfield pressure scheme he needed a certain type of defensive lineman to run that scheme and he chose them accordingly, starting with the Selmon brothers. And in Dallas he did the same thing. Brought in the talent he needed to run his scheme. NOT merely coaching to the talent that was there.
On the offense, he brought in people to run their schemes and didn't interfere. THOSE people, notably Norv Turner, coached to the strengths of the offensive talent.
You said good coaches aren't labeled. No, good coaches label themselves with their core beliefs and philosophies they hone over decades.
Got'cha.I'm talking about Jim Johnson in Philly.
Actually, yes.
Possibly could be, player buy-in?But still, my OP is about the last three games. Something's different.
Actually, yes.
It's a mystery
That's the big question. That whole "if we get rid of Jason then we lose all the training we invested in him" thing is not implausible with the Jones.
Of course they've trained him. He doesn't balk when they ignore him in the draft room, come down to the sidelines to give him instructions during games, or tell him they're firing coaches, does he?
Jerry's got what he always wanted. He's comfortable.