Preliminary contract talks begin with Spencer

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
8
shut...UP

and yes, he does have 3, all the way up to like 6 years, left in him. But we're supposed to be rebuilding here.
 

GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
1
sure, he will get a deal for LONGER than 3 years...but you can structure it where 4 years from now, there will be no hit for releasing him
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
Those are bad contracts to be giving out though. I think he could be easily replaced for far less. There'd be a dropoff, but the amount it would save us to be spent elsewhere is worth it.
 

GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
1
i dont think its a good idea to sign him either

i think its a bad deal....id much rather allocate his funds to 2-3, maybe even 4 other players...

BUT---this team has way too many fucking holes....adding another one is depressing as fuck
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
Yeah, Bennett killed Free in our game this year... But we wouldn't really bring him in here after all those tweets about Romo, would we?...

Who cares at this point. If he is a good player, a good fit and inexpensive...?

look what sanders and owens used to do and say....we got forced to root for those jerks.

would he want to play here? Would his brother tell him dont bother? would he be too expensive?
 

Slatemosphere

Practice Squad
Messages
308
Reaction score
0
If you let spencer go, we have to find a bruce irvin type player that can solely rush the passer. I would start crawford for run support.

Mingo makes a lot of sense now
 

cmd34(work)

Draft Pick
Messages
4,342
Reaction score
1
Lol so he suddenly cant rush from the strong side? You obviously dont watch any LSU games. He rushes from the strong 80% of the time

Yep. Mingo played LDE and Montgomery played RDE in most of the LSU games I watched the last 2 years.
 
Top Bottom