How much credit should Callahan receive for improved run game?

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
By RAINER SABIN Follow @RainerSabinDMN
RAINER SABIN The Dallas Morning News Staff Writer
Published: 10 October 2014 07:14 PM

Updated: 10 October 2014 10:18 PM
IRVING — As the Cowboys have won four of their first five games, powered by a balanced offense, praise has been heaped on new play-caller Scott Linehan. But a lot of the credit should go to the man he replaced, a coach who was demoted and denied a chance to seek other job opportunities in Cleveland and Baltimore during the offseason.

Bill Callahan, after all, is the man who implemented the zone blocking scheme — the foundation of the team’s prolific running game that has opened a new dimension within the offense at the same time it’s helped stabilize the defense.

“He has been an integral part in the success,” center Travis Frederick said.

The Cowboys, once reluctant to rely on anyone but quarterback Tony Romo, are now carried by DeMarco Murray.

Murray is the league’s leading rusher, a player on a record-setting pace who has galvanized a team producing 160 yards per game on the ground, the second-highest average in the league.

The gains being realized have been years in the making. In 2012, when Callahan first arrived as the offensive coordinator and line coach, it would have been hard to envision the Cowboys pounding away at opponents like they have in the first five weeks of this season.

The year before Callahan was hired, Dallas was 18th in rushing and had a blocking front that included rookie seventh-round pick Bill Nagy, undrafted center Phil Costa and aging right guard Kyle Kosier.

Revamping the offensive line had become one of the organization’s top projects, and Callahan was brought in to oversee its development.

As the Cowboys procured better personnel — using first-round choices to select left tackle Tyron Smith, Frederick and right guard Zack Martin in a span of four drafts — Callahan nurtured the nuanced zone blocking system he installed.

The scheme, which requires precise coordination, was accompanied by a learning curve and growing pains. In Callahan’s first year in Dallas, the Cowboys ran for 1,265 yards — a franchise low over a 16-game season.

“It takes time,” Cowboys coach Jason Garrett said. “You get better over time, when you do stuff and you get better players in there.”

In other words, it’s a process, as Garrett likes to say.

Last season, when Callahan served as the play-caller, things finally began to click. The zone plays that shunted Murray to the edge began to meld with the more traditional gap-blocking concepts, helping Dallas disguise its intentions.

With Callahan’s right-hand man, Frank Pollack, supervising the offensive line, the Cowboys showed signs that they could attack teams on the ground. In fact, over the last eight weeks of the season, no team averaged more yards per carry than Dallas.

“I think any style it’s a matter of being committed to what you’re doing and having the repetitive game reps and practice reps, really doing it over and over,” Callahan said. “And everybody being tied into it. Not just the line. You are building that timing and rhythm.”

But even though the Cowboys were experiencing tangible success, they weren’t committed to running the ball, choosing instead to desert the ground game at the first sign of struggle. Last season, only Atlanta had fewer rushing attempts than Dallas.

It didn’t appear as if anything would change when Linehan was hired in January during a staff upheaval that marginalized Callahan and left him with the same responsibilities he had when he came to Dallas in 2012.

Linehan’s title, which was passing game coordinator, hinted at his philosophy, and he had a history of leaning on his quarterbacks.

But Linehan has defied expectations by relying on the rushing attack Callahan helped grow.

“Bill and Frank do such a great job putting together some ideas for the run game,” Linehan said. “The concepts are very sound and fit very much what our offensive line does well and our running back does well. We have been building on that.”

Not much, however, is left to finish. The project Callahan undertook has been virtually completed. The running game that had been one of the Cowboys’ most noticeable weaknesses has become perhaps their greatest strength.

And only months after he was demoted, the impact Callahan has made is apparent. So how much credit does he deserve for Dallas’ early-season success?

“A lot,” Murray said. “Yeah, a lot.”
 

boozeman

Draft Pick
Messages
3,859
Reaction score
0
The running game was there last year. Having a playcaller who calls running plays helps.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
5,669
The running game was there last year. Having a playcaller who calls running plays helps.
Plus installing a more modern blocking scheme these young linemen are already very familiar with helps too, ditching the Byzantine one we've been using.

I credit Tony's early back problems, as the main reason Dallas now runs the ball however.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
The running game was there last year. Having a playcaller who calls running plays helps.

Exactly. Pollack is the reason for the improvement. Callahan was the coach that was responsible for breaking team records for the lowest rushing in a season. The run game improved when Pollack was hired.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
Plus installing a more modern blocking scheme these young linemen are already very familiar with helps too, ditching the Byzantine one we've been using.

I credit Tony's early back problems, as the main reason Dallas now runs the ball however.


There is nothing wrong with the man scheme. If you remember, Houck had no talent until they drafted Tyron and Tyron had a good rookie season under Houck's coaching. It is hard to coach slugs like Costa, Nagy, Holland, etc, and look good.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
5,669
There is nothing wrong with the man scheme.
Nothing "wrong" with it, no. It's just much more intricate and complex, harder to teach and execute, easier to make mistakes in. Zone was invented to make up for talent deficiency in the o-line. It became a scheme all its own and most of these young guys coming out of college are well versed in it, notso with the traditional man schemes.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
Nothing "wrong" with it, no. It's just much more intricate and complex, harder to teach and execute, easier to make mistakes in. Zone was invented to make up for talent deficiency in the o-line. It became a scheme all its own and most of these young guys coming out of college are well versed in it, notso with the traditional man schemes.
It takes talent to execute the man blocking scheme. The lineman has to beat his man in one-one match-ups each and every play. All five linemen has to win these match-ups to run the scheme at it's best. Houck was the fall guy, but the nobody could coach the scrubs that he had on the roster. I am not a fan of the zone blocking if it is run with 290lb linemen, but it is hard to beat when big linemen are used. I played and coached in both schemes. As a player, I liked the man scheme more, but I really like a combination of both schemes which is what the 90's Cowboys used.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
5,669
It takes talent to execute the man blocking scheme. The lineman has to beat his man in one-one match-ups each and every play. All five linemen has to win these match-ups to run the scheme at it's best. Houck was the fall guy, but the nobody could coach the scrubs that he had on the roster. I am not a fan of the zone blocking if it is run with 290lb linemen, but it is hard to beat when big linemen are used. I played and coached in both schemes. As a player, I liked the man scheme more, but I really like a combination of both schemes which is what the 90's Cowboys used.
I'm more traditional and like the man scheme too but it has its disadvantages, number one being the complexity compared to the much simpler zone scheme.

But yeah when your talent is suspect you can play the zone scheme and get results. Not so much, with the man scheme.

Nice thing about the zone scheme too is for the RB. People used to be amazed Shanahan in Denver could just reload them every year or so and get great results. It wasn't so much the back, it was the scheme. Zone blocking gives the RB so many more options and ways to go with it. Man scheme, if the designated hole isn't there you're pretty much married to it anyway and you're left with just trying to squirm and squiggle for some daylight. Or be feast or famine like Barry Sanders was.

Sanders in a purely zone oriented running scheme is a truly scary thought.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
5,669
I played and coached in both schemes.
Dude I came up in the split T. Have played it alot and coached it. It's making a comeback today as we're starting to see it alot more in the HS and college levels. It's artistry in motion, but it has a very simple hat on hat blocking scheme. The key to it is the "splits" between the linemen, for different plays and different situations.

We're seeing that and also some of the wing T and some wishbone even, making comebacks the last few years. I love watching a game where one of the teams runs one of these old offensive attacks. Nothing like seeing 400 yard ground games that just bludgeon people, grind them up.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
I agree. I like to see an oline dominate a game with power and a touch of nasty. It has become rare these days.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
Pollack, supervising the offensive line, the Cowboys showed signs that they could attack teams on the ground. In fact, over the last eight weeks of the season, no team averaged more yards per carry than Dallas

Not using conventional wisdom to win games is also a staple of Garretts offense. That last statement saline is a fire able offense.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
5,669
I agree. I like to see an oline dominate a game with power and a touch of nasty. It has become rare these days.
Next week locally we have a real treat, two HS teams - one runs the wing T, the other is full on air raid - are playing a district game. What a study in contrasts that will be. Both teams very good at what they do.
 
Top Bottom