Galloway - Cowboys grabbing at air for wideouts

bkeavs

UDFA
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
0
Galloway - Cowboys grabbing at air for wideouts
Cowboys grabbing at air for wideouts

Posted Tuesday, Aug. 07, 2012
BY RANDY GALLOWAY
rgalloway@star-telegram.com

OXNARD, Calif. -- Dang it, this doesn't make NFL sense. Not now, still early in August, it doesn't make sense. And at some point, of course, it's going to have to make better sense.

But the Cowboys are in training camp woefully short in the one area that drives today's offensive football in the league.

You pass to win. You pass to set up the run. It's an aerial era. Even the New York Giants, with their hard-nose, run-it heritage, won a second Super Bowl in five years in February because of ...

Yes, the Giants Cruzed into the title game, then went Manningham in the Super Bowl. Eli threw it like Eli has never thrown it, and the NY defense came alive at the right time. Postseason time.

If you ain't passing it in the NFL, the rest of the league is passing you by.

New offensive coordinator/offensive line coach Bill Callahan is now employed by Jason Garrett, with the given that he's here to "convince" Red J to rely more on the running game.

I heard Callahan say out here the other day, "you have to run it to win," and just when I'm thinking what-the-heck, he added, "but you have to throw it to win championships."

Amen. Even the new "run it guru" has the bottom line correct.

Frankly, in this day and age when you judge NFL clubs, one of the first categories considered, maybe right after quarterback, is the strength of the receiving game. How good are your wideouts?

In the NFC East alone, look at the Eagles. The Cowboys don't compare in that area. Look at the Giants, even with Mario Manningham having moved on in free agency. Do the Cowboys actually compare?

Going against current NFL offensive wisdom, the Cowboys went through the off-season and now into training camp with the theory that Dez Bryant and Miles Austin would anchor the wideout position. And after that, in a league where you need three dependable receivers, if not four, the Cowboys decided to take the grab-bag, pray-for-good-mojo approach.

Plus, with Austin and his ongoing hamstring issues (there's already been another hammy flare-up in this camp) and with Dez -- well, you know the Dez story -- depending on even the frontline receivers is iffy.

But the current supporting case features such names as Andre Holmes, Kevin Ogletree, Dwayne Harris, maybe rookie Danny Coale, and for the moment, a real long-shot free-agent rookie in Tim Benford, out of Tennessee Tech. Benford has been getting nods of approval in this camp.

Basically, it's a big grab bag of nothing, at least until further notice. Holmes has been billed as the next big thing, because he is big, at 6-4 and 220 pounds, and team vice president Stephen Jones was telling me last weekend how excited Tony Romo is about Holmes' potential. The next day Holmes dropped two passes in the end zone.

For now, Ogletree is probably the third receiver, but how long has it now been since the Cowboys started waiting on Ogletree to step up?

Just for meanness, I initiated another argument with Stephen over the team allowing last season's most dependable receiver, Laurent Robinson, to walk in free agency.

Look, I know Jacksonville came at Robinson with an offer that was out-of-whack. Laurent wanted to stay here, but $32 million, with a $16 million signing bonus, was an NFL gold mine for one breakout year. Now, he will go to Jax and fade from sight, with no proven quarterback.

"We think Laurent would have signed with us for less, but how much less could he go?" said Stephen. "We were offering exactly half of what Jacksonville did, because we feel a third receiver is worth about $3 million [a season]."

With Jason Witten, the Cowboys rate him as the third receiver, so in theory, Robinson was only the fourth receiver on this team. But when Austin was down with injuries last season, Laurent was still producing best of all in the clutch. For those actually watching the games, he performed like the team's No. 1 receiver.

OK, OK ... enough grousing about Robinson.

But the Cowboys need to find another one like him, and there seems to be a confidence factor that sooner or later they will. If "that guy" is not on this current roster, then when final NFL cuts happen, the search will continue. That's the way Robinson was landed a year ago.

But it still comes down to the fact the Cowboys lost a top producer at wide receiver, then did nothing in the off-season in attempting to pick up at least a journeyman veteran on the street, hoping for a revival.

Meanwhile, there is still lingering doubt about Austin's health, and Dez's productivity, combined with what currently appeared to be a grab-bag list of step-up candidates.

All this comes at a position that drives offensive football in today's NFL. If you are asking if Tony Romo currently has a built-in handicap at QB, the answer is yes. The man needs dependable and healthy wideouts.

That "oh, well" approach by the Cowboys drives me nuts, but nobody seems all that concerned about it out here.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Read where when we went 4 wide with an empty set, we were lining Felix Jones up in the slot.

:like
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
Robinson is pretty close to being cut in Jacksonville, so there is a chance!
 

bvhawkeye

In the Rotation
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
Robinson is an injury prone 1 year phenom. Losing him is/was no big deal. He got cut by the Rams before we got him last year and didn't we cut him once last season too?

Check the waiver wire this season and pick up someone.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
Robinson is an injury prone 1 year phenom. Losing him is/was no big deal. He got cut by the Rams before we got him last year and didn't we cut him once last season too?

Check the waiver wire this season and pick up someone.

uhh what? He had a terrific year and had a great chemistry with romo, he is big long and can run.

if for any reason he were to get cut which would make less than zero percent of sense it would be like we hit the lottery this summer.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
The rant seems off base.

If we find someone who can be this year's Laurent Robinson, great. That means we can run more plays where our fourth best receiving option is the primary on a play.

If not who the fuck cares? The balls will go to Dez/Austin/Witten/Murray/Felix. The league isn't driven by wideouts it's driven by QBs. Plenty of teams are having success with less talent at receiver than we have.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
The rant seems off base.

If we find someone who can be this year's Laurent Robinson, great. That means we can run more plays where our fourth best receiving option is the primary on a play.

If not who the fuck cares? The balls will go to Dez/Austin/Witten/Murray/Felix. The league isn't driven by wideouts it's driven by QBs. Plenty of teams are having success with less talent at receiver than we have.

its randy galloway.

as useless as dale hansen
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Robinson is pretty close to being cut in Jacksonville, so there is a chance!

You mean Laurent Robinson? I don't understand the Jags. They up and give Robinson ALL that money, and yet continue to play hardball with Maurice Jones-Drew.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
Robinson is an injury prone 1 year phenom. Losing him is/was no big deal. He got cut by the Rams before we got him last year and didn't we cut him once last season too?

Check the waiver wire this season and pick up someone.

Wow, sounds a hell of a lot like Austin just before he raked in 50M.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
"We think Laurent would have signed with us for less, but how much less could he go?" said Stephen. "We were offering exactly half of what Jacksonville did, because we feel a third receiver is worth about $3 million [a season]."

This is just fucking pathetic.

"We offered half because we have a specific price point for his position"

This is essentially the retarded twin of their reasoning for Spencer. Paying a player based on what they expect from that position, not what they actually have gotten or reasonably should anticipate from the player.

Not to mention Robinson wasn't just a #3. He filled in as a starter for about half the year and produced very well.

Now we sit on our thumbs and hope another player just as capable pops out of thin air?
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
When you have limited resources, you have to budget.

Call me crazy but I see no issue with what SJ said.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
Not from what I saw on NFL Network yesterday. Not even close.

I dont think there's any way they'd cut him, but the word from multiple news places I've seen is he has been awful there and that the Jags VASTLY overpaid.
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
I'd hold off on drawing conclusions about the receivers when you know for sure that the QB throwing to them is worthless.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
When you have limited resources, you have to budget.

Call me crazy but I see no issue with what SJ said.

I agree and was saying that before free agency. The guy had some nice games for us. But his TD number likely would have never been replicated, and we'd have been paying big money to a guy giving us 750 yards and 4 TDs per year. And people would bitch like crazy. You have to budget that spot, regardless of who the player is.
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
Austin getting hurt is what worries me. I think the Cowboys can get by with (insert any name here) as the #3, but to only have Bryant would limit the passing game. We need guys that can run the whole fucking route tree, not just three (yea i’m looking at you Dez).
 

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't have given Robinson the contract he got from the jags. Think the front office did good there. But the guy did have talent. Injuries just killed him early in his career. I definitely don't think his production will be plug and play with whoever they stick in there
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Are you reading the tweets? Says that the Cowboys are in preliminary talks with Plaxico Burress.
 
Top Bottom