TheZoneSucks
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,278
- Reaction score
- 53
I have to ask this question of you guys because I saw this at the home for morons known as "Cowboyszone":
Is he gone yet? Green's fate today is telling of the coaching staff | Page 2 | Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com
This quote is by "rocyaice" and is typical of idiots. It is this kind of thinking that keeps the Cowboys at .500 forever since the end of the last Super Bowl because the Front Office shares this opinion.
To counter this I present the cases of John Roper and Curvin Richards.
John Roper was cut for falling asleep in a team meeting, and Curvin Richards was cut for fumbling. Neither player's sins were as horrible as Green was on Sunday. Not even close. Neither of those two players had historic, all time fails, but they were cut without hesitation because they are the kinds of players that will blow it or mentally quit in big situations.
So yes, you DO cut a player after a bad game, especially one who isn't valuable at all, and is not a starter with a history of getting it done. You do it like you are Genghis Khan so that it throws fear into all the other players on the margin of your team.
Why do I think I'm right, and virtue signaling superfans like rocyaice are wrong? 3 SB in 4 years vs 22+ years of a nightmare.
Oh, and let me just curtail the usual Micky Spagnola crew's "well, who you gonna git?" bullshit right now. The answer to that question, as always is "SOMEBODY ELSE!"
Is he gone yet? Green's fate today is telling of the coaching staff | Page 2 | Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com
You don't cut a guy after one guy bad game....get a grip of yourselves....
This quote is by "rocyaice" and is typical of idiots. It is this kind of thinking that keeps the Cowboys at .500 forever since the end of the last Super Bowl because the Front Office shares this opinion.
To counter this I present the cases of John Roper and Curvin Richards.
John Roper was cut for falling asleep in a team meeting, and Curvin Richards was cut for fumbling. Neither player's sins were as horrible as Green was on Sunday. Not even close. Neither of those two players had historic, all time fails, but they were cut without hesitation because they are the kinds of players that will blow it or mentally quit in big situations.
So yes, you DO cut a player after a bad game, especially one who isn't valuable at all, and is not a starter with a history of getting it done. You do it like you are Genghis Khan so that it throws fear into all the other players on the margin of your team.
Why do I think I'm right, and virtue signaling superfans like rocyaice are wrong? 3 SB in 4 years vs 22+ years of a nightmare.
Oh, and let me just curtail the usual Micky Spagnola crew's "well, who you gonna git?" bullshit right now. The answer to that question, as always is "SOMEBODY ELSE!"